In a significant change in the story, the White House’s new revived Kovid -19 website has put the controversial lab -leakes theory at the forefront of the origin of the virus. A platform for public health information on first vaccines and testing, the site now mainly claims that the Covid-19 possibility has arisen from a laboratory accident, especially Wuhan virology institute (WIV) in China.
It marks a departure from a widely accepted story that the virus emerged naturally from an animal-human spillover, an idea that is supported by most of the scientific community.
One of the main components of the website is criticizing the “proximal original” of the “Sars-Cov-2” publication, a study is often quoted to discredit the laboratory-leak theory. White House claims that Dr. Anthony FausiFormer President Joe Biden’s top medical advisor carried forward the story to promote the idea that Kovid -19 had a natural origin. Publication, the site argues, was used by public health authorities and media, which was to silence the laboratory-leak theory in favor of more widely accepted natural origin.
The website prepares the outline of five major points that support the lab-leak theory:
- Features of unnatural virus: The virus allegedly has biological characteristics that are not usually found in nature, raising doubts about its origin.
- Single Introduction: Data shows that all Covid-19 cases detect a single introduction in humans, opposite the previous pandemics where many spillover events occurred.
- Needs for Wuhan Lab: Wuhan Institute of Virology, which has organized
Profit-term research (Increasing the virus for research), is located near the sub -center of the outbreak. The site suggests that the laboratory had issues with the biosaft protocol, further enhances concerns about a possible laboratory leakage. - Sick researchers: Many WIV researchers showed similar symptoms as Covid-19 at the end of 2019, the virus was linked to a wet market in Wuhan, it is suspected that the virus was released from the laboratory.
- Absence of natural evidence: The website claims that if there were evidence supporting a natural origin for Covid -19, it would have emerged so far. Lack of such evidence, according to the site, further strengthens the lab-leak theory.
Additionally, the website criticizes Ikohatta AllianceWhich was involved in funding research in WIV. The organization allegedly used American taxpayer money for dangerous profit-work research, with allegations that it violated its National Institute of Health (NIH) grant terms. The US Department of Justice has since investigated the activities of the Ekhath’s epidemic.
The revived site also targets public health measures such as a mask mandate and social deflection, suggesting that they were arbitrary and lack of scientific support. The site implies that these policies caused unnecessary damage to the economy and public welfare.
Perhaps most controversial, the website Biden administration accuses the administration of obstructing the investigation into the lab-leak theory, allegedly pressing evidence and pressing disgruntled ideas on the origin of the epidemic. The White House claims that the administration collided with social media platforms to sensor alternative health stories, including those who question the natural origin of the virus.
As the debate on the origin of the virus intensifies, experts take precautions that the lab -leakes can reduce the ongoing efforts to manage and reduce the impact of focusing renewed on the lab -leak theory. While theory remains a controversial issue, the White House’s decision to highlight it on the official website indicates an important change of how the origin of the epidemic is being discussed at the highest level of the government.
