Was Amitabh Bachchan the reason behind the Salim-Javed partition? What does Javed Akhtar have to say here! , Hindi film news
Salim Khan and Javed Akhtar were a hit pair in the 70s as they gave a long list of hits to Indian cinema. He wrote films that are still distinguished today and no one has ever seen such a writing post. While Salim-Javit is a mythological pair, they broke everyone when they spread. The real reason for his separation is not yet known, it was not even revealed in his documentary series ‘Angry Young Main’. In an interview recently, Akhtar said that people thought that Amitabh Bachchan was the reason behind his partition.Akhtar said in an interview that before he participated, he conceptualized a film called ‘invisible man’, which later became ‘Mr. India’. The film was conceptualized for Amitabh Bachchan, but before things can go ahead, Salim-Javed division. Thus, later, Javed Akhtar himself wrote the entire script, screenplay, ‘Mr. India’ dialogues and finally, it was made with Anil Kapoor. Akhtar said, during a chat with mid-day, “We participated in a manner in 1982, the date was June 21. Salim Saheb came to my house. Our conversation was there. It was before partition, that we thought about this idea of ’Shri Bharat’.”Rumors suggested the time that it was Javed’s proximity with Bachchan, which led to his partition with Salim Khan. Explaining this, Akhtar said, “When we participated, the situation changed. Due to my proximity to Amitabh Bachchan, many people thought that I have participated in a manner due to my proximity with Amitabh with Salim Khan. Because of these rumors, I did not do anything. I made the first film with him after participating with Salim.”Akhtar also revealed that he always maintained respect for Salim because he was older and thus, he always said the last. However, they were always similar during the writing process as a pair. “When we were sitting to write the screenplay, we were equal. But, we both come from a culture where we have inherited this’ quota bed ‘. He was older than me, was more experienced than me, so we said that’ we were working when we were working.
