Rahul’s claims are absurd, Kang’s voting representative disorganize, EC officials say India news
New Delhi: Election Commission officials on Saturday slammed Lop Rahul Gandhi to accuse the “fixing” pole panel of Maharashtra Pol, stating that “absurd” allegations – Congress was rejected in a letter on December 24, 2024 – not only for “demotivate”, stations for constituency.An EC executive officer told TOI, “Any wrong information is spreading, it is a sign of insult to the law. After an adverse decision, it is trying to discredit the EC that this agreement has been done, it is completely absurd.”Also Read: ‘Maharashtra Pol Matter Fixed, Bihar Next,’ Rahul Gandhi accusedThe EC found strange that the LoP has chosen to fly its grievances on other forums, rather than writing it directly – party meetings, Lok Sabha, even interaction on foreign soil and now, a op -ed article. “If he is sad, why he is writing to EC or demanding a meeting,” the worker asked.Convicting the appointment process of CEC/EC, the authorities underlined that it was only under the Modi government that the law was amended to allow the LOP to be said in appointments. “All CECs/ECs were appointed at the only will of the executive under the previous CONG GOVTS,” an official said.EC officials reiterated that an average of 58 lakh votes in Maharashtra elections were elected on an average between 7 am and 6 pm. An executive officer said, “From these average trends, around 116 lakh voters, more than 65 lakhs, who actually voted in the last two hours, had voted.”As regarding the alleged discrepancies in the roll amendment, the work underlined that more than 27,000 booth level agents (Blas) appointed by the Congress were included in every stage of summary amendment in Maharashtra. While voters in Maharashtra increased by 8.1% since the final assembly poll, the same increase was 13.4% for Jharkhand and 16.2% for Telangana. Congress won both Jharkhand and Telangana PolEven after the final role was published, only 89 appeals were filed before the District Magistrate and one before the Chief Electoral Officer, the Final Appellate Authority. In addition, Congress candidates/agents did not increase any certified allegations of unusual voting at the time of investigation conducted after voting.
