On Sunday (local time), US President Donald Trump appeared to support a possible governance change in Iran, seems to have opposed the stand of his own administration that Operation Midnight Hammer – American airstrikes on three nuclear sites in Iran – were not aimed at bringing a governance in the Islamic republic.Trump posted on his true social platform, “If the current Iranian rule is unable to make Iran again great, it is not politically correct to use the word, but if the current Iranian rule is unable to make Iran again great, then why would there be no rule ???Earlier, members of his administration such as JD Vance, State Secretary Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, all made public remarks about how Operation Midnight Hammer was only to target nuclear sites, and not to top the Iranian rule.Hegseth said at a news conference, “This mission was not about the change of governance,” was said at a news conference, with the aerial bombing of Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan atomic sites.“Our idea is very clear that we do not want to change a governance … We want to end their nuclear program and then we want to talk to Iranians about a long -term disposal here,” Vance told NBC News.Speaking to CBS News, Rubio stated that the exact mission had only three objectives – three targeted atomic sites.He said, “It was not an attack on Iran, there was no attack on the Iranian people, and it was not a governance,” he said.
