SC draws the jail department to violate the freedom of a person; Order to pay Rs 5 lakh to a man detained for the month despite bail. Bharat News

New Delhi: Despite its release on bail, prolonging UP jails to illegally detain a man for 28 days, the Supreme Court on Wednesday asked the state to give an interim compensation of Rs 5 lakh to the state and ordered a judicial inquiry on behalf of Ghaziabad Jail officials.Taking a hyper -technical approach – the bail order mentioned Section 5 instead of Section 5 (1) of the illegal conversion of the Dharma Act and the same typo was repeated in additional sessions and on 27 May, in the release order of the District Judge – in the release order of the District Judge – the jail authorities refused to release the withdrawal, who converted to Hinduism to marry a Hindu girl.Almost proceedings with the Director General (Jail) and Jail Superintendent Sitaram Sharma were present in the court on a bench of Justices KV Vishwanathan and N. Kotiswar Singh, “The entire incident of saying at least unfortunate is unfortunate. Each of the stakeholders in this process knew what the crime was, what was the crime number and the classes under which the man was accused and the punishment section.,Given that Aftab was released on Tuesday, when the SC took an umbrage to deny freedom on the basis of hyper-technology, the bench said, “AFTAB was sent to a spin and despite the order of the SC of 29 April (a bench’s order led by CJI), and on 27th May), and the district is released on 27th May), and the district to us, which is clear to us. Is.“Liberty is a guarantee of a very valuable and valuable right for a person under the Constitution. It cannot be martyred on these useless technologies. We only hope that no other convict or undertriate is being jailed due to similar technology. The bench said that UP jails had 90,000 prisoners.The SC asked the Ghaziabad District Judge to complete the episode of the episode by August 18 and asked the DG (jail) to respect the court orders and understand and implement the need to make the jail employees sensitive and implement that they should not repeat such incidents.The bench said that if it was found from the investigation that the jail authorities would cost the individual authorities to delay the release of AFAB despite valid bail orders. It asked the UP government to give compensation of Rs 5 lakh by Friday.UP advocate General Garima Prasad informed the court that the jail authorities had transferred the trial court to improve the order issued to the trial court on May 28, which included Section 5 (1) of the opposing law, but the trial court did so only on 24 June, after which Afab was released on Tuesday evening.SC asked the state not to search for typographic errors in cases related to liberty and said, “Otherwise, we (judges) are evidence-reading, while most of the people of the country will be behind bars.”