To decide the legitimacy of SC Madras HC, India news should be on Tamil Nadu Act on university VC appointments

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday entertained the Tamil Nadu petition, which raised its law due to the order of Madras HC, which gave the state government the power to appoint the Kulkahlis of the university rather than the Governor, but denied the MK Stalin government’s petition to suspend the HC order to re -operate.The TN fielded a team of senior advocates in the fray to argue-AM Singhvi, Rakesh Dwivedi and P Wilson-HC remained on the law, without considering the urgency of appointing the Vice Chancellor in Universities, the recommendations of the governor to influence in cold-storey, the law remained on the law.The law, giving the state government to appoint a VC in universities, was stalled with nine other laws, for which the bills were reserved for the President’s view by the Governor, but it was believed that he was approved by the President in the controversial unprecedented ruling by the controversial unprecedented ruling by the two-judge SC Bench on 8 April.Three days after ‘approved’ by SC, three days after ‘considered’, which is now subject to the opinion of a Constitution bench in the context of a President, which questions the use of Article 142 power of SC, which was assigned to the bills passed by the assemblies by the constitution handed over by the constitution handed over by the constitution, TN Gowat informed nine bills.The bench refused to remain an HC order, but before HC asked the UGC and Public Interest Litigation Petitioner to respond to TN’s plea in four weeks. For UGC, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said that the law is contrary to the UGC rules that only strengthen governors to appoint VCs in universities.When senior advocates said that they would argue before HC for stay holiday, Mehta said that in that case TN should withdraw his petition seeking transfer of PIL from Madras HC to SC. He said, “The state may not have both options at the same time and it may be allowed to argue before HC that SC is considering transferring itself to the pilot,” he said.Wilson demanded HC to highlight some ‘rigid comments’ against him, as he was pointing to the SC’s 2-J bench order. Justices Narasimha and Mahadan said that this request would be considered by SC during the final hearing on TN’s petition.To appoint the Vice Chancellor of Universities in the state, one of the notified acts notified by the state on 11 April by the state related to the vestion of the Governor in the state as Chancellor in the state. On May 21, a holiday bench of HC remained on this amendment provision, assuming that UGC Rules, 2018, will be strong based on the principle of publication on the state law.The state said that it objected to the delay in filing PIL, but the HC division bench “did not call for clarification from the HC or the petitioner’s registry, but proceeded to listen to the case in a hurry in a hasty.” HC did not even give the state a week’s time to file its counter affidavit, and passed the “Stay” stay order to file its counter affidavit to the state, saying that the order leveled is full of personal attacks on the senior lawyer appearing for the state.