Why Masood of Bilawal Bhutto, offering Hafiz extradition is a shame – no power, no credibility, no faith; Just a frustrated taste? , Bharat News
New Delhi: Every time Pakistan indicates peace, it decreases on an important element. faith. India has faced repeated betrayal in serious moments, from the 1965 war after Kashmir’s 1947–48 invasion, Operation Gibraltar, Pakistan’s 1971 rift in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) in 1971.This was followed by sponsorship of extremism in Kashmir since 1989, former 1999 Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpey’s visit to Lahore, 2001 Parliament attacks and 2008 Mumbai Carnaz, after the 2008 Mumbai Carnez, despite the backchalchal negotiations, Kargil War.The 2016 Pathankot airbase attacks soon after Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s amazing stop in Lahore. Then the Uri attack, the 2019 Pulwama bombing, and most recently, came on the Pahgam massacre on 22 April. For each olive branch, India has often hidden a dagger behind it.
Security personnel on the site after the Pahgam terror attack on 22 April. (PTI)
At the core of these repetitive provisions are Pakistan-supported terrorist organizations such as Lashkar-e-Taiba (Late) of Hafiz Saeed and Jai-e-Mohammed (Jame) of Masood Azhar. Both of them are for their roles in unrest and deadly deadly attacks, one of the most desired terrorists in India.In this context, the latest comments of former Pakistan Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari have raised eyebrows. Bhutto has claimed that Islamabad is ready to extradite Hafiz Saeed and Masood Azhar, provided India “legally supports.”This proposal is contrary to Bhutto’s earlier posture. A few days after India put the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) into Abhay, a blind corn relevished a combative statement: “I want to tell India that Sindhu is ours and will remain ours. Either the water will flow into this Indus, or their blood will be.”
So does this sudden axle explain, more and more than the rhetoric that sets fire? Is this a real change in Pakistan’s policy or is India a frustrated attempt to pull back to the conversation table, especially on the Indus Water Treaty, which New Delhi suspended after the Pahgam terror attack?And most importantly, should India take Bhutto seriously?Pakistan, which depends about 90 percent of agriculture on the Indus river system, considers the treaty as important for its food and water security. As the upper Repairian state, India takes significant advantage. A low flow can intensify economic crisis and internal disturbance in Pakistan.Union Home Minister Amit Shah, Union Water Power Minister CR Patil has strongly stated that the central government has developed a comprehensive strategy to prevent Indian river water from flowing into Pakistan.Rejecting Pakistan’s strong objections on IWT, PM Modi also made it clear that “the water related to India will now serve Indian interests alone”.
Importance of IWT
In this light, Bhutto’s statement seems to be a strategic step, intentionally unclear and easily withdrawing there is no progress.“Bilawal Bhutto Zardari does not have any locos standy. He is not in the cabinet, he is not a part of the armed forces. Yes, his father is the president of Pakistan (Asif Ali Zardari), and is all about. Therefore, the Pakistani Army asked people like Bilwal Bhutto to comment, who can take back the Artrad,” said Major Gaurav.He further said: “Because the Indus Waters Treaty by India is conducted by India, they want to give India a branch of olive as a peace or white flag tokens. But tomorrow, if the public backlash is a little too much … At that time, Pakistan may say that Bilawal is not part of the government.”However, accepting that Bilawal’s statement is not completely without importance, Major Arya said, “India should only absorb Bilawal’s comment and just wait for official statements”. He said, “If the Pakistani Foreign Ministry creates a point, India’s MEA will create a counterpost,” he said.
Ultimately, Bhutto’s extradition overcher is a policy shift and less complicated by distraction – a diplomatic decoy aims to regain control of slipping a story from the hands of Islamabad.Pakistan finds itself a corner with Ebens and Indus Water Treaty in India, which did not show any sign of trusting. The offer to hand over to long-lasting terrorists may seem an institutional, but it lacks institutional weight and reliability-especially when someone is designed with an executive rights.For decades of repetition of Islamabad, rigorous India is unlikely to flow by rhetoric alone. Transparency, accountability, and terrorist infrastructure, without an unequal crack on the infrastructure, is very few reasons for re -joining New Delhi.
