Chinese University expels woman for ‘inappropriate contact’ with a foreigner

A Chinese university stated that it would expel a student because he had “improper contact with a foreigner” and “national dignity damaged,” the video that suggested that he was intimate with a Ukrainian video gamer after the video broadcast online. The announcement stopped the hot debate in China. Some commentators appreciated the verdict and said that Chinese people, especially women, were very high for foreigners. But others said that the expulsion smacks sexism and patriarch, and compared it to examples of people accused of rape or sexual harassment in the campus, who were more lightly punished. Many also criticized the University, Dalian Polytechnic University in Northeast China, publicly posting the student on their website last week and to identify the student by his full name. Jhao Hong, a professor of law at Peking University in Beijing, said, “If there is someone who actually reduces national dignity in this case, it was not a woman whose privacy rights were violated,” Jhao Hong, a professor of law at Peking University in Beijing, wrote in a ramp Used institutions. “ The university said that the conduct of the student, an incident said that it was on 16 December, “caused negative effects.” It did not give any details, but said that the student is being punished according to a university regulation about “civil morality”. It reads the regulation: “Those who have unfair contact with foreigners and damage the national dignity and school’s reputation will be given a demerit or above based on circumstances.” Chinese social media users quickly added the announcement with the Ukrainian professional video game, Danlo Telenko’s video shared on that date, which goes by the Zin surname. Telenco, who was visiting Shanghai for an asports tournament, posted her own videos with a Chinese woman on her Telegram channel, where she currently has around 43,000 customers. Teslenko has removed videos since then. Screenshots and recording are still roaming online, showing both clearly in a hotel room, the woman feels that she is being shot, but no one is showing sexually clear behavior. In an email response to the questions, Telenco said they removed the video when they realized that they were spreading on Chinese social media. “I understood that these clips, although not intimate in nature, were very personal and unfair to public sharing,” he wrote. “It was my fault, and I honestly apologize for it.” Teslenco on Sunday addressed two positions on the social platform X, which spread after the news of the expulsion. He wrote that he believed that he was sharing “just a normal moment from life,” nothing “derogatory”. But on Chinese social media, there was a general consensus among the commentators that there was disrespect. The only question was by whom. Users, who made the university’s decision happy, said that the woman had embarrassed China, it seems as if Chinese women were specially promised with white people. A tech blogger with 14 million followers wrote on platform Weibo that “fountains on foreigners” will never bring respect, and that “some mistakes are unforgivable.” Some state media outlets also shared the full name of the woman. But other people asked why Vitrial was mainly directed to the woman, rather to share the video, instead of Telenco. (Teslenco often makes raw jokes in his customer post on Telegram with Shanghai Video, about women, online, online, posts, which he indicated that he would show his pictures if he likes their posts a lot.) Other users criticized the university for trying to implement old moral standards. According to university rules, other behavior that can give rise to sensors involves listening to sexual activity very loud and at any time. The woman could not be reached for comment. The university did not return the request for comment. Some people also reported that Chinese people who posted on social media seeking or showing Caucasian wives often come in the form of national heroes and paragons of masculinity. Others highlighted the case of a male student, who was found guilty of rape and placed on probation by his university, or a male professor who was allowed students to be teaching after sexual harassment. Some major legal scholars encouraged the female student to sue the university to violate secrecy and an education rights. “As an adult woman, whether she has sex with others, she is completely within the right to sexual autonomy,” Jhao wrote. Some official media outlets also offered the woman measured rescue. The Global Times, a tabloid controlled by the ruling Chinese Communist Party, wrote a comment stating that the “problem students” should be “directed to identify their mistakes,” but privately. Others stated that the expulsion was not final – notice said that the student had 60 days to appeal, but that the revelation of his identity was irreversible.