The Supreme Court overturned the detention order when India news after the child was mentally broken

New Delhi: This is a classic case how courts should not decide the custody of a child between parents, only by listening to the arguments of the lawyers of the warnings in the court without interacting with the minor to learn about the child’s choice and comfort level with the parents.Ten months later, a woman directed her divorced husband to hand over the custody of a 12 -year -old boy, the Supreme Court recalled her order, as it resulted in the minor and emotional breakdown of the minor, who did not want to separate from her mother and is now undergoing psychiatry treatment at Christian Medical College, Vellore.Along with the apex court, a bench of Justice Vikram Nath and Prasanna B. Varle, who met the child only a few times in 12 years, accepted the error by the top court, said that a bench of Justice Vikram Nath and Prasanna B. Varle said that the judicial order had a “disasters” on the health of the child and gave his order by detaining the mother.In this case, the couple divorced within two years of marriage in 2011 and the child had been living with the mother since then. She got married four years after divorce. In 2022, the father approached a family court for custody of the child on the basis that the woman was shifting to Malaysia with her second husband. The family court dismissed the petition but Kerala HC and SC allowed their petition in August last year.The court order led to a decline in the child’s mental health and clinical psychologist’s report, with the minor suffering from anxiety and fear, with a high risk of separate anxiety disorders. The mother then filed a review petition to remember the order and placed a medical report before the court.Permission for its petition, the court said, “It will be extremely rigid and insensitive to the courts of law that the child is expected to accept and flourish in a foreign house, where his own biological father is like a stranger for him. We cannot do the trauma that is prepared for the orders of the father’s orders, which is ready for the orders of the father’s orders.,This admitted that the child’s deteriorating mental health was “as a result of the custody of changing judicial orders” and trusted the medical report to reversed its order.