Relating row: California Republican sued for blocking the plan of Governor Newsom; Democrats carry forward fast-track votes

California Republican has asked the state Supreme Court to block the redistribution scheme of Governor Gavin Newsom, arguing that Democrats are enacting laws that can add five new Democratic Congress seats to counter the Republican benefits in Texas.The emergency petition filed by four Republican MPs on Monday claims that the scheme violates the 30-day public review rule of the State Constitution for the new law. According to the New York Times, “Instead of overseeing a one-month long transparent and participation process by an independent citizen Recovery Commission, the public will be presented with an up-or-down vote on the map secretly prepared by the Legislature.”According to the Reuters of the news agency, the Republican wants the court to stop the process by at least 18 September, until each legislative room protects the three-fourth of the vote. He requested the court to rule the qualification by Wednesday or stopped the process, while the case is being reviewed.Democratic leaders, who have supermascularity at the Sacramento, intended to pass three bills under the “Election Rigging Response Act” on Thursday, which is a “Election Ringing Response Act” to complete the time limit of Newsom for a special election on November 4. A spokesman for the governor dismissed the challenge, saying: “Republican Americans are filed in a deeply unheard of (and really laughing) suit to prevent the voting? We are neither surprised, nor worried,”.The push is part of a broad national battle when US President Donald Trump urged the Texas Republican to rebuild mid -decade maps to secure five more GOP seats. Democrats in California are now chasing the “tight-after-tat” strategy to compensate for Texas and preserve the house control. Republican currently holds a narrow 219–212 majority in the chamber.Critics say the step weakens California’s Independence Rewintment Commission, which was designed in 2008 to ensure transparency by voters. Democrats argue that this is a temporary emergency measure to combat “extreme” efforts.The lawsuit also highlights technical constitutional questions, including whether the 30-day watch begins when the bill number is assigned or only after the commencement of full text. The New York Times reported that the California Act requires the final lesson of the bill to be available 72 hours before any vote, Democrats say they are looking along the employed route of Thursday.The National Republican Congress Committee has already indicated plans for further litigation.