‘Police put evidence’: SC receives the guilty of the death line after a decade. Bharat News

New Delhi: A bottled investigation by the police, which also “put” evidence “” “, and the proceedings by the trial court sent a person to a person to hang a person in the case of rape-killing of a child in Uttarakhand. After a decade in the shadow of death, after jail, the Supreme Court not only sentenced him, but also acquitted him.
After examining all the evidence, including a bench, a bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sanjay Karol and Sandeep Mehta, not a single piece of reliable evidence was found against the man and pulled the trial court with the state police in the way the investigation and prosecution were pulled out. The court rejected its sentence by both the High Court along with the trial court.
The incident took place in Udham Singh Nagar district in June 2016 when the girl disappeared during a jawan and her body was found in a nearby area. A day later the man was arrested. The bench said that when the FIR was lodged, no witness claimed that the girl had been seen with the man who was in charge of sound and light in Jagran, but he later alleged that when the police made her an accused.
There is no glimpse of satisfactory evidence: Court
It also said that the doctor who investigated the girl was not investigated and did not even disclose the name of the policeman, which was handed over to the samples and neither said the samples were sealed and handed over to a safe position. The court said that the police made their statement and tried to stick the case on the person.
“After being arrested, the appellant confessed to the crime and said that the clothes that were wearing at the time of the crime commission were placed in a bag, which he was carrying in his hand. He also said that he was intended to throw clothes, but before he exposed it by the police. It is difficult, if not impossible, if not impossible, the appellaters who had a sufficient opportunity to believe that the appellates were, which was not an independent. Was, after the incident, he will keep the same with him for about two days so that the police could get the facility to recover at the same time, “the bench said.
It said that there was no “equality of evidence” on records to satisfy the court that the samples collected from the girl’s body and the man collected from the man who were later sent to the Forensic Science Lab, were properly sealed or remained in a safe position. “There is every possibility of samples of tampering/manipulation by police officers to get favorable results from FSL, which instigated the appellant in the crime,” he said.
The bench also found a mistake with testing proceedings as the accused was not represented properly. “Thus, it has been established beyond suspicion that the test was not conducted properly,” it said.
“The way the testing was conducted, the fortifications have been done with the evidence of the sub-inspectors Prahlad Singh, who was allowed to narrate the entire confession of the appellant in his examination. The process adopted by the trial court is completely illegal to allow an accused to accept the confession made by an accused by an accused,” TT said.