Ahmedabad aircraft accident: What is the cause of the accident? Engine failure, bird hit between many principles. Bharat News

Mumbai: Two short videos surfaced after the AI ​​171 crashed outside the Ahmedabad airport – after several questions, from those who have blown commercial airlines. On social media, pilots were asking: 1. Why was the aircraft landing gear not taken back?2. Did the aircraft face a dual engine failure?3. Was the engine died due to potential fuel contamination or blockage?4. Was there flaps on wings for take-offs?5. Can a bird contribute to a hit accident?The AI ​​-171 accident will have a detailed analysis of the final inquiry report, to be released before 12 June next year, potential causes and contributions. But for aviation professionals, two videos offered several clues.Captain Amit Singh, an air safety expert, said, “The lift of 5 seconds, the pilots usually put the landing gear up.” Captain Manoj Haq, an officer of East-Aar India, who has taken over as Director (OPS) and Director (Air-Safety), said: “As soon as the positive rate of climbing, the landing gear is withdrawn.”A low landing gear increases the consumption of drag and fuel, reducing the speed of the aircraft. Withdrawing the landing gear allows a smooth aerodynamic flow which helps in climbing the aircraft. But the clips increased the landing gear, even the aircraft climbed above 400 feet above the ground.DGCA statement signal on dual engine failure | What could be the reason that AI -171 did not withdraw its landing gear, although it climbed to a height of about 400 feet? “There is a distraction that pilots can forget to keep the gear up. The distraction may be a failure of a dual engine, a combination of birds or both. The dust as a plum of dust as the aircraft crosses the end of the runway, shows that it was low in power and possibly a dual engine problem,” said the air security expert Captain Amit Singh. Former AI official, Captain Manoj Haq said, “It is possible that the reason for a dual engine flame-out was that the landing gear could not be withdrawn. Bird ingestion or fuel contamination could cause double engine failure. Given the trajectory and body angle of the aircraft, it appears as if the aircraft has stopped due to the loss of speed. ,Another pilot, who requested oblivion, also talked about dual engine failure and potential fuel contamination. The possibility of a dual engine failure is a rare incident with about seven documented accidents in the last seven decades. DGCA said in its statement that the pilots gave a call on May 1 after the take-off, supporting the principle that a dual engine failure probably occurred after the aircraft crossed the speed after which a take-off could not be eliminated safely. The video clips show the aircraft landing on the choke-e-block of a crowded area with gliding and buildings. Later, the nose of the aircraft is raised – the AI ​​-171 pilots were probably trying to prevent the aircraft from crashing in a crowded area. But increasing the nose causes a loss of aircraft. The clip shows that the aircraft disappears from view and accident. But even though the pilots had not pulled the nose, it would have continued, descending, descending and eventually crashed, Captain Singh said. Other points were flap – aerial equipment that are reduced to increase the lift on the wing. While some pilots said that the flaps was not reduced because during the take-offs, others said the pictures show that they were less.The investigation of aircraft accidents such as the Aircraft Investigation Bureau of the International Civil Aviation Organization by the Civil Aviation Officers follows the criteria prescribed in the Annex 13 of the International Civil Aviation Organization. This suggests that the primary purpose of an investigation should not be to assign defects, but should identify and stop the same future events. Under the attachment 13, a preliminary report should be prepared within 30 days of the event. But ICAO leaves it in the state (India, in this case) to decide whether it is to make it public or keep it private. However, the final report, which should be published within one year of the accident, is made public.