Pakistan aims to crush India in 48 hours, but turned in 8 hours: CD Chauhan | Bharat News

Pune: Prominent Defense Staff General Anil Chauhan said that “at around 1 pm on May 10, Pakistan aims to bring India to its knees in 48 hours” but “his operation, which he thought would continue for 48 hours, was folded in about eight hours”.“Then he picked up the phone and said that he wants to talk,” said General Chauhan.He said that Operation Sindoor was the first time India was engaged in non-contact war. “We didn’t see each other. We saw it either through radar or through different ranges, except what was happening. It was a mixture of kinetic and non-non-cultic war. When I say non-economic, the information took place in domain and cyber domain. And of course, there were kinetic operations where there was a destruction. It was also non -linear in nature. So something is happening on LoC and anything is happening as Sargodha. ,He talked about how India networked all its air defense architecture and was using AI for the future analysis.CDS: India accepted Pak’s call for de-sizecase, but not immediately So better and fast information was available from our side. We also tried to network our counter UAS system, which was combating the drone. And in 7-15 days, we were able to do so, “said General Chauhan.CDS, while providing a special lecture conducted by the Defense Department of Savitribai Phule Pune University on the “Future of War and Warfare” on Tuesday, will also touched the data-centered war, which will be based on data analysis, which decide cognitive or decision-making data analysis. “A similar green shooting was seen in OP vermilion,” he said.He also explained how, through the op vermilion, India raised the bar and rebuilt new lines for military operations in response to terror.Referring to his previous media statements about the loss of loss of India, Chauhan said, “You should be able to understand what went wrong, fix your mistakes, and go out again despite the initial failures. It is an identity of a professional force. And something we have displayed. What I said in a couple of my interviews – this disadvantage is not important, it is the result which is important. “Chauhan compared it to test cricket, where, when one side wins by an innings, there is no question about how many balls or players.General Chauhan said that they will share data on the result of Indian strike based on technical parameters like electronic intelligence and signal intelligence at some point. Saying that it was a strategy to shed blood to India with a thousand cuts of Pakistan, Chauhan said that General Asim Munir (now Field Marshal) had spewed a similar poison against India and Hindu a few weeks before Pahgam. “But these decisions can be taken back as Pakistan faces a different kind of possibility that it faces military action if we find the terror that occur against us. So we have increased the bar. We have connected terror with water and we have prepared new lines for military operations against terror. ,When Pakistan asked for talks and de-size, General Chauhan said that India accepted, but not immediately. According to the CDS, the decision to talk about two facts of Pakistan’s two facts: “They must have assumed that if they continued in this mode, they were likely to lose too much. And second, since they hit us on many fronts, they still did not have the advantage of understanding what they hit and they wanted to talk. It is only one or two days later that he realized that all his attacks against us had failed. ,Revealing the night of the first aerial attack on 7 May, CDS said, “We did it from 11.05 am to about 1.30 pm, and five minutes later we asked the Director General of Military Operations to say that we have done this, we have only killed terrorist goals, the military installations have excluded the festival of strike, and ensure that there was no coaltal damage. We need to talk to each other. ,The CDS said that war has expanded in space, cyberspace, electromagnetic domain, etc. “The electromagnetic domain led a lot of activities between us for four days. There was also interactiveness in the cyber domain. We had a lot of activity in the domain of penseption management, or perhaps you can call it more than cognitive warfare.,