Anna University Rape Case: Tamil Nadu CM MK Stalin’s response to AIADMK’s ‘Hu is the that Sir’ Question | Bharat News
New Delhi: On Monday, a political slugfest exploded after the Anna University’s rape convict was sentenced to life imprisonment, opposition AIADMK intensified his attack on the Tamil Nadu government led by MK Stalin-which responds to the identity of the person referred to as “sir” in the same time and was excluded from the investigation.Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin reacted without any name, that the court appreciated the “excellent performance of the police in the case”.Opposition leader E Palanisamy also accused the rape guilty, making “back-to-back efforts” to mold Ganiskaran. “In this case, the Stalin -led DMK government made several attempts to mold the convict, DMK’s Gyansesekaran,” Palaniswami said in a post on X.“That’s why we still ask questions: #Woisthatsir- A question demanding full justice. Who is mentioned in the cedar? Why was it rejected during investigation? Why the DMK government completely pinned Gansashakaran to end the matter? Otherwise, no” sir “could be protected by any power,” he said.Reacting to this, Stalin said, “During the test, we have completed the case of Chennai student in just and rapidly in five months, and have secured a serious punishment for the culprit, much more for the high court to praise the High Court. A woman was injected., BJP leader Tamilisai Soundarajan also questioned the Stalin government how the state government can take credit for this.“They have been convicted. There should be no exemption in their sentence. I want to mention two things- the legal process has accelerated, but I do not know how the Stalin government can take credit for this. If they are taking credit for this, who will take responsibility for this incident?” He said.Last year, a second year student at Anna University was sexually harassed in the campus. After an investigation, the Chennai police arrested Gyansekaran in connection with the incident. A Mahailla court in Chennai gave the convict a minimum period of 30 years and a fine of Rs 90,000.
