Unlike his idol, at the age of 22, Alkaraj won the Major on grass, hard and soil. Nadal won the first 4 slam in Paris Day 1 was talked to, but Sunday night was the perfect catalyst for the tennis world to go into a tizzy. At the age of 22, Rafael Nadal won five Grand Slam titles and when Carlos Alakraj did the same by taking out the Jannik Sinner in Rafa’s ‘Home’ Rolland Garos, the call became loud.Go beyond the border with our YouTube channel. Subscribe now!Alkaraz said after a five-and-a-half-hour epic, “This is a statue that I am going to keep forever, winning the fifth Grand Slam at the same time as a rafa-My statue, my inspiration. It’s a great honor.”
Both are spaniards, both of them share an occasional-dai attitude, both are fans of the dying real Madrid. There are many surface similarities between the two. So much that in a decade and a half, Rafa loyalty feels that Alkaraj is a natural successor for his throne of heart.
Voting
Which player do you like?
But is it so easy? Do Nadal and Alakraj bite with the same cloth? The answer is probably ‘no’.Nadal came at a time when the world was in fear of the beauty of Roger Federer. This Spanish matdor shook the tennis stronghold with incredible ability to bear the tennis stronghold. Federer, who grew up on Swiss clay and believed till 2005 that it was a matter of time before winning the French, suddenly did not know how to achieve his youth slavery on Paris’s red soil. It was a puzzle that Federer never resolved – he defeated Rafa on other surfaces, but never in Rolland Garos.Who is that IPL player?Nadal won 14 French Open titles – a record that is unlikely to be broken – and it was much more with various aspects of his game that he joined his original performance list of being an incredible retriever. But to begin, the myth of Rafa began as a counter -protest for the elegance of Federer.This is a fundamental difference between Alakraj and Nadal. The Murika boy appeared on a large platform almost as a savior in early 2022, when Federer was all, but Nadal was in a decline and Novak Djokovic was untouchable master. The tennis was getting a bit unilateral, and it required gold dust of artistry to keep it attractive to the consumer pampered by Swiss-Spinish royalty for two decades.“The basic difference between Nadal and Alakraj is that the latter is as good on any surface as it is on the soil. His first slam came on the hard court of the US Open. He conquered the grass when no one was expected to do so, and now he is a two -time French Open champion. On the other hand, Rafa’s first four Grand Slam titles were all in Rolland Garos, by the 2008 Wimbledon Final, “Indian legend Ramesh Krishnan told TOI.
While Nadal became an extremely reliable volleyer and continued to connect new shots and aspects in his game, the main strength of the 22-Slam winner was his ability to defend on a slight slow surfaces. On the other hand, Alkaraz, even as a teenager, was a combination of attacks and defense – his ability to play the role of derogatory winners has been the cornerstone of some of the best moments ever. His drop for the match against Novak Djokovic in the 2023 Wimbledon finals was shot from 0–30, or his ability to get out the winners from his bag in the last set tiebreak on Sunday, was more federer than Nadal for alkaraz tennis tragics.The greatest praise for Alakraj probably came from another master Djokovic, which feels that he has “not played a player like him” after the final loss of 2023 Wimbledon “. “Roger and Rafa had their own strengths and weaknesses, but Carlos is a wonderful player. I would say that the three of us are the best in his game. ,This probably incorporates the game of Alakraj. And when John McKeno said on Sunday that “these people (Alakraj and sinners) will defeat Roger and Rafa in their head”, you will leave with a dilemma: “Who will you pay to see? Nadal or Alakraj?Krishnan smiled in Query. “I will probably pay to see both.”
