Relationship under investigation under Trump-Apple: Allegations of sexual harassment by Maria farmer in 1996; White House reacts

Former colleagues of Jeffrey Epstein are being attracted afresh, including allegations of sexual harassment by artist Maria Kisan in 1996. At the time, the farmer, then in the mid-20s, alerted the law enforcement not only for the alleged abuse of Epstein, but also expressed concern about the powerful circle around them- which now included US President Donald Trump, then New York Real Estate Magnet.The original account of the farmer, recently re-introduced by The New York Times, included a series of interactions with high-profile individuals in Epstein’s New Mexico Renches of her younger sister and Epstein in the social class. While the farmer never accused Trump of criminal behavior, he expressed inconvenience to his appearance and perceived conduct, recalling an incident at Epstein’s Manhattan office in 1995, where Trump allegedly saw his feet until Epstein intervened, allegedly said, “No, no.” He is not here for you. ,In 1996, the FBI and other law enforcement agencies warned the farmer’s warning and then in 2006, in 2006, they became largely unheard. No record of his report has been released publicly, and several relevant documents have been rebuilt or sealed in Epstein’s case. Nevertheless, the testimony of the farmer has attained renewed importance amid growing political controversies, which may still be in unhappy Epstein search files.Trump has not been accused of any wrongdoing regarding Epstein. Law enforcement officials have continuously stated that the President is not aiming for any investigation related to the humiliated financier. Nevertheless, the initial allegations of the farmer have raised questions about whether his name can appear in the seal federal files, even if only the tangent.The matter has been rapidly politicized. Trump’s colleagues have repeatedly pushed for complete public disclosure of Epstein files, arguing that selective transparency can be used to tarnish political reputation. However, Attorney General Palm Bandy recently reversed the earlier commitments to release additional materials, a review stated that there was no base for new allegations- a decision that has only added to speculation.The allegations of the farmer come up due to how quickly they were and they had exposed a broad reference. He worked for Epstein in 1995 and 1996, initially helped achieve artwork and later managed his Upper East Side Townhouse. In 1996, he reported sexual harassment by Epstein and Gholine Maxwell in his assets in Ohio- before the first financer was convicted.Despite doubt at that time, his family, including his mother and sister, supported his account and confirmed that he had nominated Trump among the powerful men with fear that he was being preserved. Nevertheless, it is not an indication that the FBI followed his claims or examined Epstein’s relationship with Trump.The White House has rejected the claims of the farmer. White House Communications Director Steven Cheoung said, “President Epstein’s office was never in the office.” “The fact is that the President dropped him out of his club to crawl.” Trump himself emphasized that he had abolished his relationship with Epstein decades ago, already capturing them as “terrible man” and in the 1990s and early 2000s were captured videos participating in social events simultaneously.Also Read: Jeffrey Epstein’s ex-girlfriend Stacey Williams on Trump-Apastin Bond; Describes Duo as ‘Bro’ and ‘Wingman’In 2019, Epstein was arrested on federal charges of smuggling minors. He weeks later died in jail, the authorities committed suicide by his death. His arrest and many constant confidentiality of investigation have left a cloud of suspicion on many of his previous colleagues- especially people with political influences.Amid calls for transparency, Trump has recently supported the release of Grand Jury testimony related to Epstein, stating that he has “nothing to hide.” However, legal experts note that even if released, such records can provide limited insight into their relationship with Epstein, which was not in primary criminal proceedings.