Bill Ekman Zoharan makes a shocking accusation about Mamdani; Your father’s ‘suicide bomber’ theory – what you need to know

Billionaire Hedge and Fund Manager Bill Ekman trained his guns in Zoharan Mamdani, a candidate of New York City, after taking him to his father’s controversial “suicidal attackers” and recognizing him as “soldiers”.Ekman replied to a post, pointing to Mahmud’s stance in an attempt to target Zoharan, saying, “Apple does not fall far away from @zohrankmomdani tree.”The excerpts that went viral are from the book ‘Good Muslim, Bad Muslim: America, The Cold War, and the Roots of Terror’, which was published in 2004 written by Mahmood Mamdani.The highlighted text states: “We need to identify the first and foremost to the suicidal attacker, as a category of solder. Suicide bombing needs to be understood as a feature of modern political violence rather than tarnishing as a trace of barbarity. ,

But why did Mahmud make such a claim? Listen to it yourself from man

Zoharan’s father Mahmood Mamdani, who is a professor at the University of Columbia, made many arguments about suicide bages and how he should be seen in the current political context in his 2004 published book.In an interview with the Asia society, he talked about his stand on terrorism. Mahmud said that to understand terrorism today, one needs to look beyond ideas like “self-defense” or “anti-colonial struggle” and focus on “deep link between state and non-state violence”.“To understand terrorism, we need to go beyond the violence beyond the violence of liberation movements, beyond the violence of colonial struggles and liberation movements. Today to understand non-state terror, we need to understand historical relations between state terrorism and non-state terrorism,” he said.Using it as a reference, he talked about the need to “reconsider” a suicidal attacker, which he claimed, as a throbac for Western media views “either a throbac for pre-modernism, either as adult rational or as adolescents reaction by patriarchal authority.”Saying this noting “very easy and very self-serving”, Mahmood presented his understanding of the term: “The reality is more likely; the suicide back is more likely to arise from a youth rebellion than the patriarchal authority. The suicidal attacker comes out of the history of Intefad. ,According to the interview, his comment on calling a suicide bomber a “soldier” comes in terms of political business and generational failure for a long time.He argued that the Vietnam war or apartheid, unlike South Africa, both finally ended, the business continues in Palestine, becoming “cruel reality”. “Older -generation failure explains the frustration of the younger generation in part to find a human option in Palestine, resort to violence in politics. Nevertheless, we need to identify that suicidal attacker is a misunderstanding. Suicide attacker is a category.

Soldier

Whose purpose is to kill – even if he should die to kill, “he said.