Call on screening of Udaipur files by Monday: Supreme Court from I & B Ministry | Bharat News

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday asked the Special Committee constituted by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to decide that the censor board-clearing ‘Udaipur opposing the screening of the files: Kanhaiya Lal Tailor’ on the basis that the film, the film, for the allegedly Musfat Mohifer with the tailor of the tailor, for the Hahamad, Marked, Markets, Marked, Marked, Marked, Marked, Marked.Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, who appeared for Maulana Arshad Madni, and senior advocate Maneka Guruswamy, who appeared for the prominent accused in Kanhaiya Lal’s case Mohammad Javed, argued against the release of the film that it would harass a particular community, who would prosecute a particular community, who would prosecute.A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymlya Bagchi also asked the police to ensure the safety of the film’s producer and his son, who have received death threats.For the filmmaker, senior advocate Gaurav Bhatia told the bench that the film was approved by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) after incorporating 55 cuts. He said that the petitioners released Delhi HC to release the film in the eleventh hour, saying that the producer was facing huge losses in addition to the stipling of his independent speech.The case was said in a competition between the right to free speech and the right to life, a bench headed by Justice Kant to decide the representation of Madani against the release of the film by Monday, which is the next date of hearing. It also allowed the lawyer for the chief accused for the main accused to participate in the proceedings before the committee.Those who accept the trial of prejudice with prejudice had the right to listen.It also warned against the release of the film allegedly received by the producer and his son. The SC asked the police to evaluate the perception of danger and take appropriate steps to protect them.Sibal said that as Madani’s lawyer, he saw the film during an HC-order special screening. “Once I saw the film, I was shaken in every sense. It is a complete thematic dissertation of hatred.”The bench pointed to the advocacy of Sibal’s free speech and recalled the senior advocate that he would one day argue against the free speech. This is such an occasion, Justice Kant said.Sibal said, “Look at the film. This is something that causes violence … Seed violence. It is completely destruction of a community and a positive aspect of the community is not estimated in the film – violence, homosexuality, condemnation of women. It is unimaginable that a democratic nation will allow screening of such a film. ,Bhatia said, “There were more than one crore views on social media with the tailor and posting of his video. Before reducing the video and released after the achievement of the horrific and fierce Act. None of the petitioners opposed the posting of the video on social media. The film gives the message of communal harmony and an appeal against violence. ,Kanhaiya Lal apologized for forwarding the post, which the killers called the sacred.Guruswami said that if the film is released, the accused Javed will be completely prejudiced during the trial. “The free speech cannot be allowed to conduct a fair test,” he said, touching two sub -judicial matters in the film by connecting some comments – the tailor’s end and the knowledge -wise – also brought the judiciary into humiliation.Justice Kant said that the SC was not upset about the derogatory remarks against the judiciary, as it was used by the so -called intellectuals to curse daily. “We are used to curse such a kind every day. Our judicial officers are not children or teenagers affected by a film or are influenced by some dialogues to decide a case to be impressed by some dialogues.