New Delhi: Chief Justice Bra Gavai on Wednesday heard a petition by Justice Yashwant Verma of Allahabad High Court, who demanded to reduce the report of an in-house inquiry panel, entangled in cash sacks discovered at his official residence on the night of 14 March, when he was a judge of Delh HC.“This would not be appropriate for me (a bench led by him) to take up the case because I was part of the administrative processes related to the judge (the cash-in-kothi incident). I will lish it to hear it as soon as possible,” CJI Gavai said. Other members of the bench were Vinod Chandran and Jomalya Bagchi of Justice.Sibal Verma wants immediate hearing before accepting the removal speedKapil Sibal, a lawyer of Justice Yashwant Verma, who has already doubted the process adopted by the inquiry panel on his YouTube show and questioned that with the recommendation of CJI Sanjeev Khanna’s decision to start a removing motion to Gavt, he sought a hearing before a day after a day. Removal speed.Probably understanding the need for a rapid hearing before accepting the speed of removing the speaker of the Lok Sabha, Sibal said, “There is some urgency. Please list the HC Judge’s petition for the hearing. The recommendation for their expulsion raises some important constitutional issues.”In his social media panel discussion, which included former SC Judge Sanjay Kishan Kaul and East-Delhi HC Judge Mukta Gupta, Sibal said that sending an in-house panel report to the government to send in-house panel reports to introduce politics with a purely constitutional process.The writ petition by Justice Yashwant Verma, which has been filed through the Advocate Vaibhav Neeti, has questioned that Delhi Police and Delhi Fire Service personnel who discovered cash, did not seize it or prepared ‘Panchnama’ (the statement of the witnesses confirming cash), which could be an acceptable proof alone.Former CJI Khanna accused him to be subject to media trial by uploading “unsafe” content against him on the official website of SC, Justice Verma said that the principles of natural justice were violated because the then CJI did not give him a personal hearing either resigning or voluntarily after the choice of retirement. The 3 May report of the inquiry committee was sent with a recommendation to start the proposal to remove the President and PM on 8 May.
