Deja Wu Diplomacy: Why Donald Trump’s Iran’s plan feels like George W Bush’s worst mistake | world News
George W. Bush stands for twenty-two years after Bush declared a “mission full” on an aircraft carrier-to immerse the Middle East in anarchy-America once again stands on the edge of another possible war. This time the goal is Iran, not Iraq. The President is Trump, not Bush. And the weapon of choice? A 30,000 -pound bunker buster for the purpose of the Fordo nuclear facility buried under a mountain.But remove the names and places, and feel familiar with persecuting the shape of this crisis. A president under pressure. Intelligence dispute. Neoconservaative cheerleaders. Talk of surgical attacks. A public tired of endless wars but atoms killed for fear of apocalypse. Sound familiar?Welcome to 2025. Or is it only in camouflage in 2003?
Cakwalk Complex: We have seen this film before
In 2003, the Bush administration sold the Iraq war as a cakewalk. American soldiers will be welcomed as a liberator. Democracy will bloom in the desert. Saddam will fall, and the area will be stable. reality? A long occupation, thousands of American and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi deaths, and birth of ISIS.Now, in 2025, Trumpworld believes that the same strike on Fordo – Iran’s heavy determination – will miraculously resolve the nuclear crisis. Supporters such as John Bolton resonated “Bomb Ford and B. Doot with It”, echoing the accidental partnership of Iraq’s early architects. Tulsi Gabard, director of National Intelligence, has said that Iran is not actively manufacturing bombs. Trump’s response? “I don’t care what he said.,This is not a strategy. It is a muscle memory.
The Intelligence Split: Then Powell, Now Tulsi
Back in 2003, it was Colin Powell’s United Nations presentation that helped sell war despite flawed intelligence. The dissonance was silenced, doubt was buried under patriotism. Rapid forward to 2025: Tulsi Gabbard publicly opposed the President on Iran’s nuclear intentions. His conclusion? Iran is not close. Trump’s befitting reply? He does not care. The difference is now the theater: Powell had a United Nations. Gabbard interviewed 1 March. But the implications are the same – a president is separating the evidence in favor of “Vritti”.
Neocon comeback tour
They never really leave.Figures like Bill Crystal and John Bolton – Iraq’s mood architects – have returned, this time cheerleaders are playing to bomb Iran. “You are to go to war with the President,” Crystal now says, in a serious turn at Donald Rumsfeld’s notorious Quip.Trump cannot be a neocaine, but as Iranian-American scholar, Vali Nasar, it says: “We bought all the happy things about Iraq. Each perception proved to be wrong.” And yet, some people in Washington are ready to reinstate the same confusion – with interest.
Endgame? What endgeam?
What happens after Fordo’s bombing?This question – ignored in Iraq – today he hunts military mind. Admiral William Follen, once oversee American operations in the Middle East, is blunt: “What is the plan? What is the strategy? What is the desired end state?”General David Petrus believes that Trump should offer a tech-It-dai ultimatum in Iran: disintegration or face warning. But as Petrius also accepts, it “legitimate” only a strike when diplomacy fails. And if Iran vengeance – as it would be almost certainly – America can be dragged into a conflict in Iraq, Syria, Red Sea and possibly Lebanon.Iran is not an Iraq. It is large, more integrated, and the entire region has a war-defined proxy.
Trump’s war cabinet: disputed, misleading and combustion
Unlike the internal circle of Bush, which spoke with a (dangerous) integrated voice, Trump’s national security class is chaotic. Gabard opposes Trump. Bolton publicly criticized him. Intelligence leaks are everywhere. Even the closest advisors of Trump are not sure what he will do. “He talks to many people,” Bolton recently said. “He is looking for someone who will say the words of magic.” A cool idea when atomic diplomacy is at stake.
Tehran to Tel Aviv: A broad warfare
Supporters argue that the strike will help protect Israel – especially Iranian missiles hit an Israeli Hospital in Barsheba recently. People of a more religious diversion also argue that it is God’s job to protect Israel. But others fear that it may be a backfire. Pro-Iran Milisia could attack American bases in Iraq and Syria. Houthis could close the Red Sea. Hizbullah could open a front in Lebanon.And then there is Iran: a nation of 90 million with a fierce nationalist army, not the hollow-out forces of Iraq in Saddam.The Legacy Trap: Trump’s “Mission Complete” moment?There is no banner yet. No aircraft carrier photo-up. But the stage is equally equal. A populist run by President Bravo. An uncertain threat to political influence inflated. And a restless political class with old Hawks, expect another war to be right.In 2003, the United States invaded Iraq on a lie. In 2025, it can bomb a hump to Iran.Trump wants to prove that he is stronger than Obama, smarter than Bush and more decisive than biden. But if the Fordo strike goes wrong – if it triggers a broad struggle – then its name, such as Bush Ki, can be included in the long bookkeeping of American overache.As the vein seriously warned, “You don’t know where it is about to stop.”Iraq’s audience is not behind us. It is just wearing a new flag.
