EC vs Congress: Rahul Gandhi shows that 5 methods ‘votes were stolen’; Gives ‘proof’. Bharat News

New Delhi: Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Thursday carried forward his attack on the Election Commission of India, as he called “Vote Chori” in the recently concluded elections, in which he called “Vote Chori”, in which his party was beyond the popular predictions. During a press briefing, the Lok Sabha MP fled through a presentation, as well as with a spiral-bound stack of documents, which he claimed that the election rolls were extracted from the “7-foot heap” of the election commission, India had provided to the party.Rahul Gandhi said, “There were criminal evidence” how the electoral roles had moved ahead of the election. He said that 1,00,250 votes were stolen in five ways Mahadevpura Assembly Constitution of Bangalore Central Lok Sabha seat.

DupleyKate votefirst instance: In a slide shown by the Congress party, a voter constituency called Gorakirat Singh Dhang appears in four separate polling booths in booths. Dhang booth numbers appear in 116, 124, 125 and 126.Rahul Gandhi said, “This is not just one person. It is thousands of people in an assembly.”

Durkirat Singh Dang

Second example: A voter named Adtiya Shrivastava is seen in the lists of four separate voters in three different states of Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka and Maharashtra.

The same voter mutalip state

Fake and invalid addressThere were voters whose house number had allegedly shown “zero”. Father’s name shown: ILSDFHUG. Another voter’s father’s name read: DFOIGAIDFRahul Gandhi said, “There are three types. Either the address does not exist, or the address is zero, or the address cannot be verified. These are 40,000 voters.”

“invalid address”

Wholesale voters in the same addressThe Congress party presented a picture of two rooms, claiming that 80 and 46 voters were registered to stay in the same room respectively.

“Wholesale voters in single address”

‘Invalid’ photosThe party showed voter roles, which had pictures that were smaller than the required size, which made it difficult to identify or was not at all.

‘Invalid’ photos

Abuse of Form 6Referring to a voter named Shakun Rani, Rahul Gandhi claimed that his name appeared twice – once Shakun was in the box and Rani was in the nickname box. However, in second form, Shakun Rani named in the box (with zoom-in photo) appeared, in which the surname was empty. The voter’s name was on two voter lists.

‘Abuse’ of Form 6

Meanwhile, the Karnataka Election Commission has asked Congress leader Rahul Gandhi to submit a formal announcement, supporting the claim of his “vote chori” (vote theft), as well as allegedly incorrectly included in the voter list with the names of the electioner to initiate necessary action. Karnataka Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) is expecting an announcement and oath signed from Rahul Gandhi till this evening, sources told TOI. Saying that the electoral roll was prepared in a transparent manner, the Karnataka Pol body said: “The election results can be questioned only through the election petition before the Hon’ble High Court”. The Chief Electoral Officer of Karnataka wrote in a letter to Rahul Gandhi, “You are requested to sign and refund the declaration/oath attached under Rule 20 (3) (B), with the names of such voter rules (s), the rules of 1960 voters, so that the necessary action can be initiated,” Karnataka’s Chief Electoral Officer wrote in the letter to Rahul Gandhi. The declaration form attached to the letter stated that submission of false evidence is punishable under Section 227 of BNS, and also that a wrong announcement regarding electoral rolls is punishable under Section 31 of the Representation of the People Act 1950.Rahul Gandhi hit back to ECIReacting to the Election Commission, Rahul said: “I am publicly asking everyone. Take it as an oath. This is their data, and we are displaying their data. This is not our data ”. “Interestingly, he has not denied information,” he further said. “I am a politician. What I say to people is my word. I am publicly calling it to everyone. Take it as an oath. It is their data, and we are displaying their data. It is not our data. It is not our data.