The Berlin Administrative Court on Monday ruled that the rejection of shelters on border control is illegal until the Dublin process of the European Union is done.Immediate decision is a shock for Chancellor Frederick Mars, who has promised to tighten the migration. Shortly after taking office last month, the Chancellor Mars government advised the police to return irregular migrants on the border, even if they apply for asylum.
What do we know about the case?
The decision came in the case of three Somali citizens, who were returned to Poland on 9 May under the new German regulation.The court said that such rejections bypass the necessary legal steps and violate the refuge rights.The court said, “Those who express their desire to take refuge in a border check over the German region cannot be sent back” before the country is responsible for processing the claim under the so -called “Dublin” system of the European Union, the court said. Three, two men and a woman arrived at Germany by train from Poland on 9 May.The federal police stopped him at the railway station in a deer oider in Frankfurt in the eastern state of Brandenburg.The three said that they wanted to apply for asylum in Germany. However, he returned to Poland on the same day. The police argued that they had entered from a safe third country.However, the court also ruled that “petitioners could not allow in Germany, saying that dubin refuge procedures could be” close or close to the border. ,
How has the government responded?
Internal Minister Alexander Dobrid, who is responsible for implementing the migration policy, said on Monday evening that the ruling applies to the matter only in the case, and the government would stick to its migration policy.Shortly after taking office last month, the Chancellor Mars government advised the police to return irregular migrants on the border, even if they apply for asylum.“We will continue with pushbacks,” Dobrid said in a statement, “We think we have legal justification for it.”Dobrid said that the internal ministry would provide more detailed justification for pushback as per the request by the court.The internal minister said that in question the migrants tried to cross the border thrice, and only on the third attempt, did they implement the right to refuge. A Prior to the February general election, Crackdown was a central pledge on irregular stay in Merz’s campaign.The vote saw a distant option for Germany (AFD), which achieves its best results, winning more than 20% of the votes. Merz has since argued that decisive action on migration is necessary to prevent AFD’s rise.
Merz migration policy was criticized
Following Monday’s decision, Germany’s center-left Green Party, now protested, said the court’s decision supported his stance that the migration policy of the merge was obliged to fail. “This is a serious necklace for the federal government and should serve as a warning to follow the law in the future and will deliberately not more than its own powers for populist purposes,” Greens’ legalist Ireen Mihalic told The Rainsesh Post Newspaper.“The blockade on the border was rejection of the European Dublin System and angered our European neighbors.”Carl Koppp, managing director of Pro Sharan, a group of pro -German immigration, told The Renische Post that the illegal practice of national unilateral action has failed in the “asylum policy by internal minister Dobrindt.”Last week, Dobrid said that he was expecting an European Union (EU) agreement on a proposal to send refugees failed to return “hub” to safe third countries. The European Commission has also proposed a plan to allow member states to reject asylum applications from migrants that have passed through the third country before entering the European Union. The proposals have so far been passed in the European Parliament or have been adopted by the National Governments.
What is Dublin Regulation?
Dublin regulation is a law of an European Union that determines that the European Union country is responsible for the application.However, under the rules, the police are not allowed to change back the border seekers.Instead, German authorities should begin a complex process to move them back to the country where they first entered the European Union.The first is the country of the European Union where a refugeer enters and where fingers are taken, is usually responsible for the claim.The idea is that it ensures that a person does not apply for asylum in several European Union countries simultaneously.This system has been criticized for putting a lot of burden on the external border countries of the European Union such as Greece and Italy, which are often the first entry points.
