IND vs Eng Test: Stuart Broad convicted the selection of India’s team for Headingly Loss; For AdGBASTON urges two changes in the XI of India. Cricket news
Former England Pacer Stuart Broad weighed India’s five -wicket defeat in the initial test in Headingley, suggesting that the team selection played an important role in the loss of visitors. Broad reported that India may not have played the role of a wrist-spinner Kuldeep Yadav on a surface, which may be a specially aided spin in the last two days.Speaking for the love of cricket, his new podcast with Jose Butler, Broad said: “I think he found his team selected wrong, if I am honest,” Broad said. “Kuldeep Yadav should have been played instead of Shardul Thakur. With a struggle known against the pitch and England’s wrist spin, Kuldeep could have made a big difference.”Broad also said that India’s attack lacked diversity and penetration to shut down the game, especially in the second innings. He advocated the inclusion of left-bed pacer Arshdeep Singh, especially with reports that suggest that Jasprit Bumrah could be rested for a second test in Birmingham.He said, “If Bumrah is going to rest in Edgbaston, I will be wooed to bring it to Arshdeep Singh. His ability to swing the left hand and ball quickly could be something different for India’s bowling attack,” he said. “While Prasad Krishna improved in the second innings, there was a lack of threat to the overall control and wickets in the attack.”
Despite the defeat, comprehensive calmed down, insisting that India should not overhall its strategy on the basis of a single loss. He said, “This is not a panic station. You cannot take the risk of ripping plans after a loss. India was under control for most testing, and just a few twicex instead of wholesale changes,” he concluded.India will face England in the second Test in Edgbaston from July 2, which will bring many questions on the selection and strategy of the team.
