IND vs Eng | ‘What if Ben Docket was at 90?: East-India cricketer Slam Cricket News on England Headshahek drama

Former India cricketer Parthiv Patel raised a complicated question of weighed during the fourth test between India and England, raising a complicated question: “If Ben Docket was batting in the same position on 90 and the opposition offered a handshake, England must have accepted it?”The drama emerged in the concluding moments of 5 of India, when India started a strong battle to keep the series alive, a flexible, an unbeaten 203-rorn stand for Ravindra Jadeja (107*) and Washington Sundar (101*).With an indispensably seen draw, England captain Ben Stokes offered a handshahek from the Indian pair, indicating the ending of the game. However, with Jadeja at 89 and beautiful at 80, the pair rejected, preferred to chase their personal milestones because they were near centuries. In the last few overs, England resorted to the bowling spin and even handed over the ball to the part-time Harry Brook, which looked like a half-incomplete over in the hope that the batsmen would quickly and finish the match-in which England had once reduced the 311-Run lead which was reduced to just 114 from the stumps.Exchange was played on Live Television, in which Stokes saw Jadeja taunting, questioning whether he would complete his century against Brook, who is not even considered a part -time bowler.

England opener Zak Crolly also quipped, asking that Jadeja should have batted fast if he wanted to reach the milestone. During the last hour, Bhoj reflected the tiredness, frustration and helplessness of the English camp, especially after having a golden opportunity to seal the series. Stokes himself looked in pain, holding his shoulder after every delivery.

Parthiv said during his presence on Gehotstar, “England worked in their own way. His effort was clear – he wanted to bowl India and win the game.”“But when he realized that it was not possible, he put his weapons down and admitted that India played very well,” he said.He appreciated India’s resolve and the scheduled performance of their batsmen.“At the same time, India did what they wanted to do in their own way – two players really worked hard, batted brilliantly, and both were eligible to score for centuries,” he said, referring to Jadeja and Sundar’s gritty efforts.Parthiv then introduced a fictional to challenge the story around the ‘spirit of the game’.“I have the only question: if Ben Docket was batting in the same position on 90 and the opposition offered a handshake, would England have accepted it? I am very keen to know this, especially ‘many things about the spirit of the game,’ he said.

The former wicketkeeper also argued that there was every right to take India and there was still meaningful cricket left in that match.“In my opinion, the game should have been continued by the end of the day, even if the Indian batsmen had completed their centuries. If 15 overs were left, India should have batted because they worked very hard,” Parthiv insisted.He told how soon the speed had moved, remembering how dangerous the situation had seen a day before.He said, “Before lunch at day 4, when two wickets fell, it seemed that India could lose the exam on 5 days. But there is an incredible attempt to bat through 143 overs,” he said.In the closing, Parthiv supported India’s call while sharing personal opinion.“So, I am confident that what India did was absolutely right – although personally, I think they could bat a little more,” he said.The series is alive at 1-2, starting at the Oval on 31 July with fifth and final tests.