Italy’s top court rules can be recognized by both equal-sex mothers on the birth certificate of the child, World News

The Constitutional court of Italy on Thursday ruled that both women in a single-sex relationship could legally be recognized as parents on the birth certificate of a child, it can only be declared unconstitutional to limit the recognition of parents to the biological mother.The court found that refusing to recognize the non-living mother, who agreed to the medically aided pregnancy and violates the rights of children born in equal-oriented families to increase the child.LGBTQ+ Advocates received the title of ruling as a major milestone for civil rights in Italy. “This is a historic day for civil rights in Italy,” the group said, as quoted by the Associated Press.Rainbow families said in a statement, “Whatever we are saying, it is being recognized: both boys and girls have the right to identify both parents, from birth, even when they are two mothers.”The group said that the decision sends a clear message to the MPs: “It is no longer constitutionally acceptable that we are not present.”Opponents of the ruling, including the Conservative Association Pro Life and Family, condemned the decision. The group called it “irrational” and claimed that it reduced the lives of children born in equal-lingo couples.In recent years, some city officials had followed the instructions of the 2023 Interior Ministry by registering a biological mother only on the birth certificate. This forced non-biological mothers to undergo long adoption procedures to gain legal rights over their children.The instruction was part of a wide push to restrict surrogacy by the far-flung government of Italy’s Prime Minister Georgia Meloni and re-confirm the traditional family values. A 2004 law has already limited the recognition of parents in such cases, and Italy maintains strict rules on medical aided breeding, including a ban on surrogacy. In 2023, the government extended the ban that punishes Italians pursuing surrogacy abroad.The court’s decision does not address the validity of self-aided reproduction, but it expands legal protection for children raised by equal-lingo-raised joints-and challenges the current government’s restrictive stance on LGBTQ+ families.