New Delhi: Facing the pace of removal in Parliament for cash sacks found at its official residence in Delhi, Justice Yashwant Verma has kept his identity secret in the Supreme Court in his petition, while demanding an in-house inquiry report and then recommended the CJI to snatch it for the judges.A bench of Justice Dipankar Dutta and Augustine George Maasih is scheduled to hear their petition on Monday. In the petition, his name is described as “XXX”. Such camouflage is used in the records of SC and HC to sexually harass or attack the petitioners to hide the identity of women. It is also used to prevent adolescents from revealing the identity, and minors in the battle of marital custody. In many decisions, SC told all the courts that they would not reveal the names of the people left of rape in the decisions.
LS Speaker can write CJI this week for the names of panel membersJustice Verma’s petition – titled “XXX vs India’s Union” – is the 699th citizen writ petition filed in SC this year. While the center is the first defendant, SC is the second defendant. It was filed on 17 July, and after fixing the defects mentioned by the registry after the advocate on the record, SC filed a petition on 24 July.
Interestingly, while the petition “XXX vs. Union of India” is listed in serial number 56, before the bench headed by Justice Dutta, another petition of Advocate Mathews J Nedampar, has been demanded for registration of FIR against Justice Verma, which exposes the secret of cash behind the cash, its earnings and after the disgrace before it Is. Meanwhile, the Lok Sabha has accepted a notice against Justice Verma signed by more than 150 MPs. The LS Speaker is likely to write CJI Br Gavai this week to ask for the names of the SC Judge and an HC Chief Justice, which will be part of an inquiry committee under the Judge’s Investigation Act, 1968. The speaker will nominate a reputed jurist to complete the composition of a three -member committee headed by SC Judge. Following the ‘Cash-in-Kothi’ controversy, Justice Verma, a renovated from Delhi HC to Allahabad HC, has challenged the validity of the report of in-house inquiry, which is found to be guilty of cash in their residential premises and requested the SC to remove the lively sannyas to rebel the President and the abundance.
