Karen read the ‘no guilty’ of the murder of police officer boyfriend John O’Kif, he did not hit any car

After consulting since June 13, the jury pronounced the verdict in the Karen Reid case on Wednesday and found that he is not guilty of killing a second degree in the death of his Boston police officer’s lover John O’Kif, but is guilty of low allegations of drunk driving. Reid’s lawyers have been claiming for a long time that a fellow officer was implicated by the police after leaving O’Kif at a party. The prosecutors argued that the 45 -year -old Reid Hit O’cafe, 46 -year -old, before leaving away with his SUV, but Raksha maintained that O’keif was killed inside the house and was later pulled out.The incident occurred in January 2022. It became one of the most viewed cases. The second degree murder, Manslator and Boston leaving the scene were faced with allegations. The second degree murder sentence would have sentenced life imprisonment.Reid’s first test ended in a micriel after not reaching the jury’s decision in July 2024.

O’Keefe was beaten and then left outside the house, not hitting the car

Reid’s defense stated that O’Kif was beaten up, was bitten by a dog, then a conspiracy orchestrated by the police was left outside a house in Boston suburb of Canton, which included planting evidence.The prosecutors have read as a submerged lover, who chose O’Keef to die in the snow after killing him with his SUV outside the house party. The state case was led by Special Prosecutor Hank Brainon, who called the fewer witnesses than the prosecutor Adam Lali, who conducted the first test against Reid.While describing O’Kif as a “good man”, who “helped people”, Brainon said while arguing the gamblers that O’Kif needed help that night and the only person who could provide it. Instead, he went to his SUV. “She was drunk. She hit her and she left her to die,” he said.Defense lawyer Elon Jackson dismissed the idea that there was a collision at any time. He and rescue called further experts witnesses who agreed. Jackson said while closing the arguments, “There is no evidence that John had collided with a car. Nobody. The matter should be over yet, because there was no collision.”