‘New threats’: Harvard Trump slam the administration ‘by stopping money for illegal research’

Harvard Slam Trump Administration

Harvard University on Tuesday condemned the Trump administration’s decision to freeze billions of dollars in the Federal Research Fund, called it an act of “illegal government overrech” and an act of vengeance for recent cases against the federal government.
In an official statement posted on his website, Harvard said that the step threatens to weaken important scientific functions and sets a dangerous example for higher education across the country.
The university said, “Today’s letter in vengeance against Harvard for filing its case on April 2 makes new threats to prevent illegal money for lifetime research and innovation,” the university said. “Harvard will continue to follow the law, promote the approach and encourage respect for the diversity of the approach, and will compete with antismitism in our community.”
The richest university in the United States, Harvard, warned that the suspension of federal support would be “chilling implication” for scientific progress and innovation that contribute to public health and national security.
US Education Secretary Linda McMahon said in a letter addressed to Harvard President Alan Garber that the university should no longer take a grant from the federal government, as no one will be provided. ” McMahon accused Harvard of failing to fulfill his legal, moral and fidous responsibilities, and criticized the transparency of the institution, educational integrity and handling of the campus of the campus.
The statement said that Harvard will also continue to defend against the illegal government.
The Harvard has become a focal point in the comprehensive political battle on the university’s reactions to the speech of the campus, the initiative of diversity, and the university’s reactions.
In recent months, the Trump administration has threatened to cut funding, cancel the tax-free situation and ban foreign student enrollment in universities, alleging conceptual bias.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button