No Epstein Grand Jury Transcript Unsoling: Judge rejects the request of DOJ; Testify testimony called testimony

A federal judge in Manhattan has rejected the US government’s request to ignore the grand jury tape related to the sexual trafficking case against late finance Jeffrey Epstein, stating that the record provides limited price compared to the comprehensive case file already existing by the Records Department, the news agency AP reported.US District Judge Richard Burman on Wednesday ruled that a uniform decision has been followed by the judge, chaired by the case of former Epstein’s former colleague Gisline Maxwell, who is currently serving a 20 -year jail sentence after being convicted for the misuse of Epstein’s underaez girls.In his order, Burman mentioned that no victim had testified before the grand jury and the only witness was an FBI agent, whose alleged crimes had “no direct knowledge”. The testimony of the agent, mostly described as the havese, was presented in two sessions on 18 June and July 2, 2019, with a powerpoint presentation and a call log – which will all be sealed.Burman wrote, “Grand jury testimony is only a horsept snipyt of the alleged behavior of Jeffrey Epstein,” saying that the proposal to ignore the transcription appeared in the government’s possession “diversion” already in the more comprehensive case materials, as quoted by the agency.This decision comes between an increase in investigation on the DOJ approach for transparency in the Epstein case. Last month, Public Bachalash followed the Department of Justice that it would not issue additional documents from the investigation.Burman said, “The government is a logical party to make a comprehensive disclosure to the people of Epstein file,” Burman said, criticizing the limited nature of the record.Meanwhile, Maxwell’s legal team has indicated a desire to cooperate with the House Oversite Committee, demanding his testimony as part of the Republican -led investigation. However, his lawyers have requested for immunity and already access to questions, which the committee has rejected. Chair James Comer said the panel was ready to delay his statement until his Supreme Court’s appeal to expect to be resolved in late September.