Operation Sindoor: Another Pakistan lies reveal; Satellite image Dibank claims that it hits Adampur Airbase in India. Bharat News
New Delhi: Since Operation Sindoor, Pakistan has been living with fantasies and working hard to convince the world that it won during the struggle against India. With the use of a medical satellite image, fake visuals and misinformation campaigns, Islamabad claims that it collides with Indian aerial areas and establishments. After Operation Sindoor, Pakistan depicted that it killed a Sukho -30MKI parked on the Adampur Air Base in Punjab and destroyed the missile unit from the S -400 surface in Bhuj Airfield, Gujarat. However, these claims have been systematically destroyed by independent satellite imagery analyst Damian Simon, who have been closely investigating these claims in the last one month.Adampur airbase: Sukhoi who was not a hitOne of the most prominent claims included a strike on a Sukho-30 MKI fighter jet at Adampur Airbase, Punjab. The image shared to support this showed a fighter, presented as Burn Mark.But top imagery analyst Demian Simon revealed the truth: the image pre -dated the struggle, the aircraft was a MiG -29 under regular maintenance, and the so -called damage testing was the engine soot -up, not the missile hit.Bhuj Airbase: Phantom Strike on S-400Another image claimed that Pakistan had taken out an S -400 radar system at Bhuj Airfield, Gujarat. A close eye sight showed dark patch on the ground, believing the impact marks, which found oil stains in a vehicle maintenance yard. Worse, the image was well captured before the hostility begins.Adampur again: fake crater marks on S-400A separate claim included the alleged missile damage to the S-400 battery in Adampur. This time, the satellite image was digitally edited, adding to the bomb bomb crater with black dots. Current, showed no such scars on the comparison site with unidated satellite images.Neeya Airbase: A cloud shadow, not bombIn one of the most absurd claims, Pakistan used an image of the Naga airbase to suggest that a bombardment raid had darkened the soil. Simon’s analysis showed that “damage” was actually a shadow casting on the runway, a passing cloud.Srinagar Airport: A staining lieA blurred, low -quality image of the Citizen Apron of Srinagar Airport was broadcast as evidence of the Pakistani strike. But high-resolution satellite photographs from several dates did not show any harm. The image was either wrong or deliberately tampered with.Chinese satellite firm joins showsConnecting an international turn, Pakistan also released a fantasy from a Chinese satellite company to “prove” another hit on Adampur. The “Damage”, a trace that was present was present for months, was also seen in the old satellite capture.Jammu Airport: Digital Fakery exposedSo far, in another example, scenes claiming to show bomb damage at Jammu Airport were widely shared. The “black spots” near the runway were shown to be fully intact airbase after high-resolution post-stroke satellite photos. The original image was replaced digitally.During all claims, Pakistan has failed to display any real loss of Indian airbase or assets in its retaliation attempt. In contrast, Indian aerial attacks at Pakistani military sites, especially Jacobabad and Bholari, have been more successful.Damian Simon wrote in a post on X, “Recent imagery from Bholari airbase, Pakistan indicates that the hanger damaged in the Indian air strike is now covered with Tarplin which is probably indicating repair activity/restoration.” Immediately after Operation Sindoor, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Adampur Airbase strengthened only the absence of any significant damage on Indian soil, a direct counter for the Pakistani story.
