Recruitment scam: SC allows the West Bengal government to maintain ‘untrained’ teachers for now, order to keep fresh work by 31 December. Bharat News

New Delhi: Supreme Court allowed on Thursday West Bengal To unpass up the government Assistant teacher Appointed through bated up Recruitment Continue to work in the light of the interests of students of class 9-12.
However, the apex court said that no non-teaching staff, tainted or otherwise teachers would be allowed to work.
The apex court directed the West Bengal Government, Education Board and W School Services Commission to file an affidavit by 31 May, attaching advertisements for the latest recruitment of teachers and completing the process of selection by 31 December.
No one is allowed to continue as teachers, there will be any benefit in the latest examination, the apex court said.
It comes a few days later, the apex court said Calcutta HC with the decision to cancel the recruitment of more than 25,700 teachers and non-teaching employees for schools, saying that selections were beyond repair.
“The entire selection process has been distracted and fired beyond the resolution, rejecting the appeal of a bench, Mamta Sarkar, West Bengal School Services Commission and 125 successful candidates of Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar.
In its judgment, SC stated that tainted candidates, who were appointed as teachers or to the posts of non-teaching staff, should be required to refund any salary/payment received. Since their appointments were the result of fraud, this amount was the amount of cheating “.
However, it has been said that even though non-dagi candidates will lose jobs, they will not be asked to return salary and reimbursement.
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee refused to accept SC and said that transferring affected employees would have been a more solution.
“I have a question here. If the only result is a transfer after a judge’s house was recovered after crores, they could also move these 25,000 brothers and sisters,” he recently said while referring to a dispute.
“We have no complaint against any judge. But, as a citizen, I have the right to say – regarding the judiciary – that I cannot accept the decision,” Banerjee said. “We can’t criticize a judge, but we can express our views on human grounds.”