New Delhi: The Rashtria Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) has reiterated its protest to demand recurrence of thousands of mosques allegedly built after the demolition of temples.
RSS general secretary Dattatreya Hosabale has made it clear that the Sangh was against the idea. Giving the backdrop of the support of the RSS for the movement launched by “Sadhu and Saint” for the construction of the Ram temple in Ayodhya, the Sangh said that the Sangh would not be able to stop its members from supporting VHP’s efforts and others captured Kashi Vishwanath Mandir in Matsuri for Matsuran, the sites came in a separate category.
“But if we talk about all other mosques and structures, should we start digging 30,000 mosques and try to reverse history? Will it not create more enmity and resentment in the society? Do we go ahead as a society or get caught in the past? How far do we go in history?” Hosabale said in an interview with Kannada Weekly, Vikram.
The SNGH general secretary delinated the stand expressed for the first time by RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat, the general secretary of the song said that the demand for allegedly controlled mosque sites can be carried forward only on a large cost for other priorities of society such as eradication and untouchables. “If we keep doing this, when will we focus on other important social changes? What about ending untouchability? How do we increase the values in youth?” He said.
Hosabale, who is only ahead of Bhagwat in the hierarchy, also felt that the single -brain may be pursued at the expense of other issues that are a matter of equal concern for those pushing – conservation, conversion, conversion, cow slaughter, cow slaughter, cow slaughter, cow slaughter, love jihad. “The Sangh has never said that anyone should ignore these issues or not work,” he said.
Hosabale further stated that the movement for the re -conversion of disputed sites was not keeping in mind the concept of a temple. “Consider the concept of a temple. Is there a former temple that has still turned into a divine place in a mosque? Do we focus on finding Hindutva in the remains of a stone structure, or should we awaken Hindutva within those who raised the traces of Hindu heritage in stone buildings, instead of finding the Hindu heritage, instead of searching the Hindus within them, instead of finding Hinduism within them.
