United Nations specialist criticizes Belarus for psychiatry punishment

Geneva: The United Nations’ independent rights experts condemned on Thursday that what he had said was “tremendous psychiatric remedies” on dozens of government critics in Belarus since the presidential elections five years ago.
The former Soviet state was captured by a major protest movement against President Alexander Lushaneko in 2020, which inspired a cruelty on opponents.
Russian ally Lushaneko has been in power since 1994 and as “one” and “sham” by opposition figures and Western powers in the elections won in January.
20 experts, who are appointed by the United Nations Rights Council, but do not speak for the global body, stated that they were told about at least 33 cases where the courts ordered the sentence.
The group consisted of five women and the oldest persons were 77 years of age, adding experts, including the United Nations special synergy over the condition of human rights in Belarus, Nils Muizonux.
He said, “There is a lack of transparency in the leading process for a transfer for mandatory psychiatry treatment and such transfer has serious doubts about being inspired by medical or political views.”
The trials that have allegedly finished transfer to mental hospitals were behind the closed doors, while the affected people are allegedly conducted as “income under the untreated power of the head physician”.
“Unlike prisoners in penitentary institutions,” a statement said, they are indefinitely deprived of freedom and cannot request an forgiveness or release on parole. ,
“According to the reports received, the eight persons transferred for tremendous psychiatry treatment have been issued,” he said.
“At least 25 other people remain income, and no information is available about their fate or their hideouts, raising concerns about their potentially applicable disappearance.”
Experts stated that they were in touch with Belarus and urged them to “allow the detained people to be able to use legal representation for effective measures to challenge the lack of freedom”.