The audience won the defamation claim brought by a Muslim worker, who criticized Hindus

Toi correspondent from London: Spectator magazine and Douglas Murray won a defamation case brought by a Muslim online influence, which overcome the trouble during the 2022 leissal riots.Mohammad Hijab, a Youtuber with 1.3 million followers, whose real name is Mohammad Hangab, claimed that an article in the audience, which was titled “Lecester and the Donnets with Diversity” and published in September 2022, maligned him.The author, Murray wrote that the hijab was a “a street agitator”, who cropped his followers in the lester to whip it “. He wrote: “Among other things, he (Hijab) told him that there are Hindu ridiculous people, not at least because of his trust in rebirth.”Hijab filed a lawsuit for defamation, claiming that he lost thousands of pounds as a result of the article.But in a judgment handed over on Tuesday in the High Court, Justice Johnson found that what Murray wrote about the hijab is “quite true, and it is not physically wrong”.The hijab claimed that his comment was not about the Hindu, but in the lester “Hindutva”, which Hijab claimed that “promotes the principles of the conspiracy, in which Muslims believe that Muslims believe to convert Hindu women into Islam”.Johnson wrote: “When we were asked to name anyone in the world, who took membership of Hindutva ideology but who was not a Hindu [Hijab] Only one name was able to give: Benjamin Netanyahu. ,He also said that the hijab “lied on important issues, with the result that his evidence, overall, is useless”.Johnson told a video of the hijab speech in the lecester, shown, “more clearly expressed than the words of the article, directly masked men make fun of men and Hinduism”.