New Delhi: Supreme Court entered BJP MP on Thursday Nishikant Dubey For his “irresponsible, absurd and condemnable” statements, which were the motives for the CJI-LED bench for challenging petitions. Wakf amendment act,Decide Contempt proceedings Trying to stop SC’s dignity for his careless allegations against Dubey, a bench CJI Sanjeev Khanna And Justice Sanjay Kumar said, “At the same time, we are firmly that the courts are not as delicate as flowers to bloom and wilt under such attractive statements. We do not believe that the trust and credibility of the courts in public eyes can be shaken by such absurd statements.“Courts believe in values such as free press, fair test, judicial fearlessness and community beliefs. Thus, the courts do not need to protect their decisions and decisions to resort to the power of contempt. Certainly, the shoulders of courts and judges are quite widespread and a underlying belief that people will be experienced and recognized when people will be experienced and assured when criticism is experienced and unlikely.Stating that it was a duty under the Constitution to listen to the petitioners, who have a fundamental right to challenge the validity of the WAKF Amendment Act, the bench said that it is not entertaining the petition to initiate contempt action, “any attempt to spread Communal hatred Or indulge in Hate speech An iron hand should be dealt with ”.“The abusive language cannot be tolerated as it leads to the dignity and loss of self-value of the target group members, contributes to being unbearable among groups, and eradicates tolerance and open mind, which is a criminally called for a multi-cultural society committed to the idea of equality. Tiwari.
