‘Total Disaster’: Trump appointed Obama as a judge at the hearing of the Harvard case; If loses, I swear to appeal again

US President Donald Trump started an attack on a federal judge, presiding over a high-dot legal battle between his administration and Harvard University.He accused him of prejudice and vowed to appeal in the case of an adverse rule.Taking his true social platform, Trump wrote, “The Harvard case was tried in Massachusetts before the Obama appointed judge. It is a total disaster that I say before listening to his decision. He has taken various Harvard matters systematically, and is a automatic” disadvantage “for the people of our country!”He claimed, “Harvard has $ 52 billion $ in the bank near Harvard, and yet he is anti-Jewish, anti-Christian and anti-America. Most of this money comes from the USA, for the obstruction of all other schools, colleges and institutions, and we are not going to allow this unfair situation to happen at any time. ,Questioning that Judge Elisen Buroz came to oversee the matter, the US President further said, “How did a judge of this trump-nominated get these matters? When she ruled against us, we will appeal immediately, and win.”He also indicated a comprehensive step to cut the Ivian League Institution in federal support, saying, “The government would stop the practice of giving several billions of dollars to Harvard, most of which were given without clarification. It is a long -term commitment to fairness in funding education, and the Trump administration will not stop until it will win.”During a two -hour hearing on Monday, Judge Beroz found suspicious in the administration case and suggested that the Ivy Trump could be strong in the legal battle against the administration. He did not give a decision, but questioned the government’s arguments as the two sides asked for a quick decision according to the New York Times.In a hearing in a Boston court, Baroz questioned the efforts of the Department of Justice for Arabs deduction in medical research funding, how the decisions of such funding clearance were linked to the civil rights of the Jewish people.They challenged the argument behind the move, if the executive branch could punish a university without proper procedure, a warning of the “shocking” constitutional implication. He said, “The thing I am wrestling with is that the executive branch can decide what is discriminatory or racist,” he said, “This ad hoc decision without any procedure.Harvard filed a case against the Trump administration two months ago, alleging that the government had violated its first amendment rights by conditioning federal funds on compliance with the university with politically operated demands. At the center of the dispute is whether the administration sidelined the rules established in a crowd to save the school.Michael Welchik, a lawyer of the Department of Justice, defended the administration’s stance, arguing that the government has the right to determine where the taxpayer’s money goes.But Harvard has dismissed the claims that it supports discrimination. Steven Lehotsky, representing the university, said the court stated that the administration’s action was “a clear, ineffective violation of the earlier amendment.”He also indicated the government’s departure from general procedures in his attempt to punish Harvard.Judge Baroz also indicated that the case could be not only on constitutional principles, but also on whether the procedure was followed.