Trump claims that five jets were shot in the India-Pakistan clash

Toi correspondent from Washington: US President Donald Trump on Friday claimed that five fighter jets were shot recently during an India-Pakistan struggle, triggering a social media dogfite, which came in between the biased between the country. In the White House dinner with Republican MPs, Trump, who is subject to domestic political siege on Epstein tape, resorted to his repeated claims about being a global peacekeeping, citing his role in reducing India-Pakistan struggle. “We stopped a lot of wars. And they were serious. India and Pakistan, which was running. The planes were being shot from there. I think four-five jets, perhaps, were shot, in fact, Trump said, Trump said, without recognizing which country lost the jets or the basis of its claims. “… they were (going ahead), and it was getting bigger and big, and we solved it through business. We said .. We are not making a business deal if you are going to throw around arms, and perhaps nuclear weapons,” Trump has denied New Delhi. Trump also gave a atomic dimension to the conflict, although most analysts say the spat did not come anywhere to dissolve an atomic border.While Pakistanis said under the notion that Trump meant that five Indian jets were shot, India’s biased said that the US President did not specify which country the fighter aircraft belonged to and Pakistan had lost the jet in the clash. However, the top Indian military officials have recently admitted that they lost an unspecified number of jet in the initial clash, suggesting that they were working below a certain political limit before being given an independent hand. This resulted in a widespread reaction that excluded many Pakistani bases and air areas from the commission before the US stepped to save it. In a recent report, The Economist cited anonymous foreign military officers, claiming that five Indian aircraft were destroyed, including at least one Rafael. The report also stated that Indian military officials have started indicating that the loss may arise from Indian errors rather than technical shortcomings.“Initial reports suggested that the decisive factor was the superiority of Pakistan’s Chinese -made J -10 fighters and its PL -15 Air -to -Air Missiles. India had underestimated them. And China has also made a balance by providing initial warnings and real -time target data to Pakistan.” But later, given the success of India in the fight, the magazine said, “The big problem may be how India used its own fighters on the first night of a brief war.” It cited an Indian defense briefcase in Jakarta, which told a seminar earlier this month that India lost some aircraft as its political leadership had ordered its Air Force not to hit the aerial rescue of Pakistan. Instead, he only targeted terrorist sites on the first day. “After the loss, we changed our strategy and we went to his military installations,” attached, Captain Shiv Kumar was asked. Most analysts say that in response to the Pahalgam attack only, after adopting the initial posture of killing terrorist compounds, New Delhi replaced it by raising obstacles on its army after a shock in the air.