Trump is the head of the NATO summit on the heel of a potential Israel-Iran ceasefire

Washington: President Donald Trump’s first presence since returning to the White House was focused on how the US obtained a pledge to spend a historical military from others in the defensive alliance – effectively bending it with its will. But instead, Trump decided to attack three nuclear enrichment facilities in Iran in Spotlight now that the administration says that Tehran’s atomic ambitions along with the President’s sudden announcement are that Israel and Iran had reached “full and total ceasefire”. A few hours before setting to depart to the summit, there is sure to dominate discussions in fast U-Tur, Hague, Netherlands in hostility a few hours before. The impact of the strike began to shape the summit, General Secretary Mark Rute danced around the issue, even hundreds of people showed them in Hague to condemn the struggle in a protest in Hague on Sunday. Nevertheless, the other countries have become accustomed to unexpected while talking about Trump, who have not created any secret of their despise for the alliance, which was made as a child against the dangers of the former Soviet Union. Trump’s debut on stage at the 2017 summit was probably remembered by Montenegro’s Prime Minister Dosco Markovic, as the US President extended the front of the pack of world leaders during the visit to the headquarters. And he started the 2018 summit by questioning the value of decades -old military alliance and accusing his members of not contributing enough money to defend themselves – on the subjects they have echoed. In Brussels, Trump set 4 percent of the defense spending as a percentage of a country’s GDP, a figure that looked unimaginable at that time. Sen Jean Shaheen of New Hampshire, the top Democrat of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, will also attend the summit this week. He said that if Trump does anything to sow the division within the alliance, it would benefit China’s Xi Jinping, which countries have accused of enabling Russia as it attacks Ukraine. “It does not help America, does not help our national security,” Shaheen said in an interview. “What it does is a win to our opponents, and for a administration that claims to be so worried about the danger from (China) is difficult to behave in that way.” Trump hugely gave his attitude towards global alliances during his presidential campaigns. As a candidate in 2016, Trump suggested that he would not pay attention to the mutual defense guarantee of the alliance mentioned in Article 5 of the Treaty as President. And during a campaign rally in 2024, Trump recalled a conversation with another leader, during which Trump said that he would encourage “Russia” “Russia” what they want that they want “whatever they want” for members who were not meeting the targets of coalition’s military expenses. In the Hague, to pledge to increase Trump military expenses – and would like to take credit – other countries need to invest in their defense on an unprecedented scale. The President argued that the US should not follow the pledge to spend 5 percent, which has been imposed on other countries. This 5 percent is effectively divided into two parts. The first, 3.5 percent, traditional military expenses such as tanks, war aircraft and air defense are composed. What the remaining 1.5 percent may include, it is slightly fuzzy, but it may include things like roads and bridges that can be used to use soldiers. According to, the US was spending about 3.4 percent of its GDP on defense by 2024. Most countries – as the major grip with Spain – are preparing to support the pledge, not only motivated Ukraine’s invasion to protect his own defense by Russian President Vladimir Putin, but perhaps also please the United States and his sharp leader. “He has not said this in some time, but in Europe there is still a lot of concerns that perhaps the United States will not honor Article 5,” said Matthew Kronig, Vice President and Senior Director of a former Pentagon officer and a former Pentagon officer, the Atlantic Council, the Atlantic Council, and Senior Director of a former Pentagon Officer, and Senior Director, said that probably will probably exit the United States, perhaps the United States will not respect Article 5. ” “I think there is a real fear among European people that we need to distribute to Trump to attach to the United States., Croning said: “Whether or not, I think Trump’s hard style gets more results.” European colleagues have noticed the potential signs of the broad American retreat. France and other countries are concerned that the Trump administration is considering reducing the level of contingent in Europe and transferring them to Indo-Pacific, which has been indicated by cabinet authorities that this is a high priority. Nevertheless, the US ambassador of State Secretary Marco Rubio and Matt Whitekar has underlined the US commitment and said that the Trump administration is only demanding a strong alliance. “In some ways – in some ways – in some ways – not a consistent approach coming from this administration, how the Trump administration, at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said how it sees.” “And now, Europeans can see what they want from the United States.” The White House has not said that world leaders will meet on the world stage in Trump Hague. It is not clear that Trump’s path will cross with Ukrainian President Volodimir Zelancesi; The two leaders were scheduled to meet in a group of 7 summit in Kananskis, Alberta, earlier this month, Trump suddenly reduced his journey and returned to Washington. Rute has emphasized that Trump’s tariff war has no effect as alliance does not deal with trade. But it would be difficult to ignore the issue as the US and the European Union continued talks on a trade deal, as 50 percent import taxes on all European goods were threatened by the US President. Trump has set a time limit of 9 July to attack a trade deal for the US and 27 the European Union of the country. But in recent times, he said that the European Union had not offered a proper deal as he reiterated his threat to force Europe to “pay what we say.”