Vicky Kaushal as Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj: The success of Chhava proves the audience that stories want, not stars – exclusive. Hindi film news

In a cinematic landscape run by high-budget glasses, action-pack sequence and star-staded lineup, ChorusA film contained in Chhatrapati’s life Sambhaji MaharajEspecially in Maharashtra, the audience is deeply carved in a unique place. Its success is not in glitz, but in its story and cultural authenticity.Mahesh Manjrekar’s recent remarks underlined Bhavna: “Vicky Kaushal is a very good actor. His film Chha collected Rs 800 crore worldwide.This statement launched a broad debate: Are the audience prioritizing emotional resonance on celebrity recognition? Atimes talked to the audience to understand what they were attracted to Chhawa.Historical plays are becoming new blockbustersHistorical films have always worked on a criterion between entertainment and education. But for the increasing number of Indian audiences, especially in Maharashtra, attention is clearly on material and cultural relevance.Ajay Ramesh Dhongde said, “We saw it to know about our past.” “Vicky Kaushal’s acting was at the top. He did not cut the corners. From the beginning to the end, he gave his hundred percent. His look, body language, everything was present.”Krushna Jagtap echoed this feeling: “We really went to understand the history of Maharaj. Vicky Kaushal played beautifully. Sambhaji Maharaj’s legacy was really impressive. ,This new wave of viewer spirit shows that the audience is being invested more in the character being depicted instead of the actor behind it. An audience, Vikrant Shingade expressed it: “You are not just watching a film, you are watching history. Yes, any other actor may have done a good job, but Vicky Kaushal really played the role. He didn’t just play Sambhogi; he became he.” He said, “Finally, when a performance is strong, the actor sometimes takes out the story, like Sushant Singh Rajput did it with MS Dhoni. It is no longer about the film; it’s about the man who brought the legend alive.”Vicky Kaushal won the heart, but the story came first

For the Marathi-moving audience, historical icons are not just letters, they are individual and cultural symbols.“We saw the film as Marathas, to see our history,” Tushar Shinde said. “So we went to see it.”This deep root connection means that viewers expect more than surface-level story tell, they expect emotional, cultural and historical allegiance.“Sharad Kelkar also fit his role very well,” said Jagtap. “But Bollywood actors still have a long way to go when it comes to painting Marathi historical figures. The Marathi industry knows how to bring that emotional intensity.”Although Kaushal’s performance was largely praised, some spectators expressed their desire to see local actors in such prestigious roles.“If Amol Kolah played the lead role, we must have gone 100% to see it,” Dhongade said. “Nevertheless, Vicky Kaushal gave a concrete performance.”This is not criticizing Kaushal’s acting, but a yearning for cultural representation. Nevertheless, other people accepted the challenge of playing such a powerful role.“If not Vicky, who else could play the role of Sambhaji Maharaj? Ranveer Singh and Shahid Kapoor took anyone in mind with a similar commanding screen appearance and emotional depth. This is a role that needs both Gravitas and Micro.Viewers want more depth and honesty

Despite its success, the verse was not without criticism. Some people felt that the film focused on the intellectual achievements of Sambhaji Maharaj.“The film is based on the life of Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj. But I felt that some things were missing,” Dhongade said. “Sambhaji Maharaj wrote many important texts, and languages ​​in which he had not shown him. He should have touched that intellectual side as well.”Jagtap said: “The end was also very quick. This is a real story, and they should have gone more deeply in the climax.”Another important aspect was music, which many people felt that there was a lack of emotional prosperity of Marathi cinema.“If Atul composed it, it could be a different hit,” Dhongade said, “The musician pair referring to Ajay-Atul.” “Bollywood struggles to match that Marathi emotional depth.”Shinde resonated: “For Marathi people, actors like Ajay-Atul bring some extra. There is an emotional relationship that struggles to catch Bollywood.”“If music, dialogue, and hero had more aligned with Marathi sensations, the emotions would have been deeper.”Such films help keep culture alive

Filmmakers are now being asked an important question: Is the story very good to stand on its own? For many viewers, the answer should be yes.“Your average spice movies flops because stories are not handled properly. Such films require a structure, not gimmick,” Shinde said.And when Kaushal’s performance is appreciated, the consensus is that the story is a true star.“Yes, there are flaws. Music could be difficult. The atmosphere could be gritiers,” Shingade accepted. “But none of it goes away from the fact that the story was powerful, the portrayal was honest, and the message was loud and clear.” And perhaps most importantly, he said, “If Indian audiences watch this film and feel,” Wow, this is our history too, “So we have been successful.”He said, “Many times, we see historical films focusing only on Hindi-speaking kings or Pan-Indian figures. But what about our own great warriors? Shivaji MaharajSambhaji MaharajThey deserve that festival. ,

In a streaming era filled with short -term trends, the chronic is long as a film that gave rise to emotional and cultural relations.“A new generation will now learn about this history. That’s what matters,” Jagtap concluded.Last takeaway: Stars can be dazzling, but these are stories that liveThe decision of Maharashtra is clear – give us stories that reflect our values, our history and our heroes, and we will show. Chhawa has redefined success not through celebrity, but through honesty. As Indian cinema is developing, it can be the beginning of a permanent innings – from fame to legacy, from face to emotions.