Vijay Mallya is related to how he told Arun Jaitley that he was flying to the UK before leaving India.

Toi correspondent from London: Fugitive liquor tycoon Vijay Mallya told a podcast in a rare interview that he told the late former finance minister Arun Jaitley that he was going to go out of India out of London before leaving for the airport in March 2016.At that time there should have been a CBI lookout circular (LOC) issued against him.Mallya said that “find out with Raj Shamani” he was not aware of any place against him, nor was it downgrade by the CBI to take them into custody to inform the officers of his travel plans to inform the immigration.He told Shamani that some TV anchors and the Indian government want to see him in Tihar in “jail clothes, jail food” and spend the rest of his life behind bars. “If this is unavoidable, what options I have? It can be unavoidable, I am not an astrologer. I will fight my way in court.”He said: “I told FM Arun Jaitley before leaving for the airport and then I took off the way of Geneva for a meeting from Delhi from London, which was fixed months ago. I told the then Finance Minister because I went to the Delhi Airport from Parliament. When I saw him once again, he said that I was denying a storm. Mr. Jaitley had to withdraw his statement and said, ‘Yes, yes, I met him, but only while walking – it was a fleeting meeting. ,“I never said that I went to Mr. Jaitley’s office, sat in front of him, there was tea with him. I said that I told the Finance Minister, I am going to London and going to Geneva for a meeting, please ask banks to sit on the table and settle with me. How long is this once in punishment? You see the way he rejected it, and then when a Congress MP pointed to his mistake that he saw us, he quickly changed. ,He also said that he had always planned to go back to India but his Indian passport was canceled.In a four -hour podcast, Mallya also said that he will be ready to return to India. “If I have an assurance of assurance of a fair test and dignified existence in India, then I will think about returning to India seriously. “He then reminded Shamani of the verdict in the Sanjay Bhandari case that found that” the state of Indian detention is a violation of Article 3 of the ECHR (European Conference on Human Rights) “, which may no longer be extradited.Asked why he had not already gone because he had lost his extradition battle in the courts, the 69 -year -old said: “My stay in England is completely valid. The special case you are mentioning is more than that. The action is going on in this country. It is one of the legal battles that I am fighting,” he said. This suggests that he can apply for asylum.