Was there irregularities in Poland’s presidential election?

Ever since Karol Navarki was declared the winner of the June 1 presidential election, Polish has been working with confidence.Leader of Opposition Laws and Justice (PIS) Party, Jaroslav Kakzinski, is gathering his supporters, preparing him for a difficult fight with Prime Minister Donald Tusk’s Center-VII government of the European Union.Kaczynski aims to work with Nawrocki to bring down the Tusk government and return to power in the latest after the next parliamentary election in 2027.But it is reported that complaints about the election in the Supreme Court of Poland have been flooded, which is casting an eye on the opposition’s jubilee.50,000 complaintsThe first chairman of the Supreme Court of Poland, Malgorjata Manovska said that more than 50,000 complaints have been received.And it has been reported that even the sacks filled with protests have not been registered.The filing complaints claim that Navrocki’s supporters were irregularities in counting for the counting of Rafale Tzscowski, rivals of the European Union.‘We will not tolerate such fraud’Speaking at the first public PIS event after the election, Kakzinski on Sunday accused the governing alliance of questioning the election results.“We will not tolerate such fraud, Kaczynski told the supporters.” We will not let the election be stolen from us. ,Nawrocki won the second round of the presidential election on 1 June, leading to about 51 percent of the votes, which was at 49 percent of Trzaskowski.Addressing the Prime Minister, Navarki said: “Future President will not allow Poland to loot his democracy and rob his president’s freedom.”The 42 -year -old historian, Navki, stopped the tusk “avoiding hysterical reactions and destroying the Polish democracy.” They are to be inaugurated on 6 August.Tusk says for explanationThe tusks initially responded with great restraint to reports of electoral irregularities.Immediately after the runoff election, reports appear on social media, stating that the navarki was often surprisingly surprisingly forward in the constituencies, where Tzscowski was clearly revealed in the first round.Because Tusk and other prominent members of his party, Civic Platform (PO) did not say anything about the allegations, PO legalist Roman Giartich seized the initiative. He uploaded a form on the Internet, he said that whoever wanted to file a complaint can just fill.“It was an electoral fraud,” the lawyer announced, one of the fiery critics of PIS.To compromise Giertych, right -wing television channel Republic has broadcast a recording of private telephone calls made by politicians for days. It is likely that they were recorded using Pegasus detective techniques.Prime Minister vs PresidentThe Tusk has made his restraint aside, struggling with the outgoing President, Andrez Duda during a meeting of the National Security Council last week. Duda comes from a political camp similar to Neverki. Both also collided on X.“Are you not just curious, as people, about the actual election results?“Sri Tusk and his allies cannot accept defeat,” said Duda. He said, “I am not keen on the election results because I know the results. The Election Commission of the state announced long ago,” he said, emphasizing that the Navarki had won by just one margin under 370,000.Government did not call for recurrenceThe Supreme Court has registered around 10,000 out of the written complaints.In the case of 13 commissions, a recurrence was ordered, with errors discovered in 11 constituencies.In most cases, votes for TRzaskowski were counted to Nawrocki or the names of the candidates were added to the official records. In one case, the Public Prosecutor has initiated the proceedings.Government spokesperson Adam Szalpka said, “We are not challenging the election results. We want to clean the cases of any problem.”Several members of the ruling coalition, including Deputy Prime Minister Vladislav Kosiniak-Commase, are of the opinion that the measure of irregularities is not enough to question Navrocki’s victory.“No leader of the coalition parties has called for recurrence of all votes after the coalition meeting on Tuesday on Tuesday,” Vlodzimierz Czarzasty said.Supreme Court decided next weekThe Supreme Court has till July 2 to investigate complaints. Judges should give their decision on the validity of voting within 30 days of the election.Two siting of the Supreme Court is scheduled to be held on this Friday. Vosecich Hermelinski, a former head of the Election Commission suspected that it would be sufficient in view of the number of complaints involved. Furthermore, it is unlikely that the Supreme Court’s verdict will end the dispute as the Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs (Supreme Court Chamber which decides on the validity of the election) was created by the PI and is not seen as independent or fair by the European Court of Justice or European Court of Human Rights.,The Polish judiciary is completely anarchy, “said Manovska.“I am not claiming that the presidential election was rigged,” Bartoz Vilinsky wrote in Polish Daily Newspaper Gazeta Vayborakza. “However, the debate about the result has a lot of question marks that a group of all votes cast in the election that is causing the kingdom of Poland.”Political scientist Antony Dudek has warned the government against pursuing the “myth of rigged elections”. Dudek on Monday told television channel PoSAT that this myth would be extremely dangerous for the stability of the Polish state and even violence or civil war.Meanwhile, Speaker of Polish Parliament, Szheimon Holonia demanded oil to pour oil on disturbed water.Holvonia said on Tuesday, “If the Supreme Court declared the election valid, I will call the National Assembly on August 6 so that Karol can take an oath as Navaroki.”