‘Weak effort on distraction’: Obama provides a rare rebuke on Trump’s claims of ‘treason’; Democrat calls it Epstein Diversion

The office of former President Barack Obama released a rare public reaction to President Donald Trump’s “treason” and in 2016 and 2020 to allegations of election manipulation.“Outside the honor of the presidential office, our office usually does not give constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response. But these claims are sufficiently derogatory for a qualification. Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbash quoted NBC News, “These bizarre allegations are a weak attempt to ridicule and distract.It comes when Trump was questioned about Jeffrey Epstein, but the conversation was redeemed by Obama alleging “criminality”. Trump said Obama was directly implicated and claimed that the action in 2016 and the 2020 were criminals at the highest level.Read more: Trump slam the East-American President; Epstein question dodgingTrump’s claims from the claims of National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe, who suggested that Obama administration officials manipulated intelligence information and reduced Trump’s 2016 election victory.Gabbard on Friday launched a criminal referral for the Department of Justice. In a later meeting with the Republican of the Congress, Trump continued his criticism of Obama and others, called him “vicious, terrible people”.Rodenbash said that the administration was incorrectly presenting the information. He said that recent documents did not deny the established conclusions about the Russian influence in the 2016 election, as confirmed by the report of the 2020 bipartite Senate Intelligence Committee under the then Chairman Marco Rubio.“Anything widely accepted in the document released last week underlines that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election, but did not successfully manipulate any vote. These findings were confirmed in a 2020 report in a report by the bipartished Senate Intelligence Committee, which was led by the then chairman Marco Rubio, “Rodenbash further said.The dispute extends to various interpretations of December 8, 2016, intelligence evaluation about Russian cyber activities. Representative Gabbard alleged that the documents demonstrated that Russia did not try to intervene in the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump, opposing several other investigations.“On 8 December 2016, IC officials prepared an assessment for the President’s daily brief, found that Russia did not affect the recent US election results by conducting cyber attacks on the infrastructure. Before he could reach the President, it was suddenly drawn on ‘new guidance.” This major intelligence evaluation was never published, “Gabbard wrote in a post.The Obama administration did not claim that the Russian cyber attack affected the election results. “I can assure the public that there was no tampering with the voting process that was a matter of concern … those who were voted were counted – they were counted properly,” President Obama told the White House, a few days after Gabard received a brief referred to Gabbard on December 2016.Obama White House said Russia tried to intervene in the campaign using bots and troll farms by leaking the hacked documents and spreading misinformation about the election – later found to be supported by special advocate Robert Muller investigations and a Senate report.Meanwhile, democratic officials depicted these developments as diversionary strategies. The Chairman of the House Democratic Cocks, Pete Aguler suggested that these matters were focused on, the aim was to draw attention to the Epstein case.Recent activities include Trump’s social media posts, which target political opponents and issue files related to Martin Luther King Jr.