Civil Society of Policy Specialist, Asia Pacific discusses the posts of the country in front of the plastic treaty talks

Bathinda: Regional policy experts discussed the dynamics of the posts and interactions of the Asia Pacific region, free from plastic (BFP) in a briefing, a global movement working to achieve plastic pollution-free future, ink 5.2 August, 2025 in Switzerland’s ink 5.2 talks. The INC-5.2 refers to the second part of the fifth session of the Intergone Industry Dialogue Committee (INC). This discussed how the countries frame their priorities around economic development, environmental protection and regional and international cooperation. The Asia Pacific countries sit on the subscription of both plastic production and pollution effects; Various economies and environmental challenges in the region make it a major battleground in the global treaty talks. The consequences of the negotiations will determine global standards for plastic production, waste management and industry accountability. Briefing also identified major challenges, including procedural issues affecting the reach of civil society, potential delay strategy, water commitments in favor of waste management on the production cap to promote the narratives of a circular economy on the reduction in pollution that reduces the impact of the industry. For more fine coverage of the treaty, panel policy experts and researchers urged journalists to consider a human rights-centered, fossil-fuel development model for Asia Pacific. It was felt important threats that could significantly weaken the treaty, including chemical and plastic-productive countries challenging the scope of the treaty, which to address a full plastic life cycle, decrease in primary plastic polymer production and can remove the possible obligations for removing obligations for concern for anxiety chemicals from the final agreement. The most important risk is that interactions can occur at a framework conference with voluntary measures rather than legally binding obligations, which will fundamentally reduce the ability to address global plastic pollution at the necessary scale and speed. An important political hurdle for a strong, effective treaty is the process of making decision -making, which depends on the process of uniform decision making, where not all countries are equal, rather than a uniform voting process. With pressure to reach consensus, countries can compromise on strong provisions to secure a deal, with important decisions on measures to reduce production, future COP procedures have been postponed. As the Asia is diverse as the Pacific region, we are most affected by plastic pollution, and often tolerate inconsistent defects. C Semi, Global Policy Advisor, BFFP said, “It is not about whether we will have a treaty or not.” This is about how many countries will be adequately adventurous to say that we can no longer continue to produce the production of plastic which we currently produce for environment and human welfare. , The Center for Science and Environment (CSE), Siddharth Ghoshham Singh said, “There is a moment to push for ambition now. Such opportunities do not come, and countries must remember who they are interacting for; their people and our shared planets. We cannot allow some vocal opponents to delay and delay progress. This firm is the time to take a decisive step towards standing up and ending plastic pollution. , Pinky Chandran, Asia Pacific Coordinator, BFPP said, “Plastic problem often resembles a polymorphic, in which no single perspective brightens the whole picture; In fact, each turn reveals a new representation. We should see the plastic problem as a tapestry, where each element is connected, interlinking, and interlocked. A fragmented, laminated approach would not just be enough. And so there should be global binding measures to reduce the production of plastic, so that to deal with the problem of plastic pollution, only through infection lens ”. Siddika Sultana, Executive Director, Environment and Social Development Organization (ESDO) said, “South Asia is an important hotspot for the center of plastic pollution and innovation. To effectively address the issue, the area must be transferred to a separate national initiative to coordinate regional action. A united approach – supported by enforcement, investment, and inclusion – can establish South Asia as a leader in developing an effective global treaty on plastic waste., “As a region, South East Asia is particularly affected by plastic pollution, and dumping grounds for plastic waste,” Puityathor Jiungsmaran, Plastic Campaign Researchers, Environment Justice Foundation said, “South East Asia is particularly affected by plastic pollution, for misleading false solutions and petrochemical expansion for plastic waste. During the previous round of talks, we have seen courageous stance from Southeast Asian countries. We hope to see those people again in Geneva. ,